create_page

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses that the page is created as a draft, that no content is included, and that explicit user agreement is required. It does not cover permissions or failure modes, but the primary side effect is plainly stated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences with no filler. The core purpose comes first, optional parameters are summarized next, and the important user-consent constraint is placed last. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations and no output schema, the description gives enough for safe invocation: draft state, no content, optional fields, and a consent guard. It does not describe return values or default behavior, but these are minor for a straightforward create operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is high at 89%, and the description adds meaningful grouping: name and slug are presented as required in practice, and all optional parameter families are listed. Minor gap: the 'description' parameter is neither described in the schema nor mentioned in the tool description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific action and resource: creates a new draft page with name and slug, and explicitly notes content/blocks are added later. This clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like list_pages, get_page, publish_page, and update_page_settings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides a clear condition for calling: 'Only call AFTER the user explicitly agreed.' Also implies this tool is not for content editing by saying content/blocks are added later. It does not explicitly name alternative tools, but the use context is clear enough.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.