Skip to main content
Glama
clssck

MCP-researcher Server

by clssck
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP-researcher Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Perplexity MCP Server

      Rohit-Seelam
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Integrates Perplexity AI's search-enhanced language models with Claude Desktop, providing three tools with different complexity levels for quick fact-checking, technical analysis, and deep research.
      3
      2
      -

    • Perplexity Tool for Claude

      letsbuildagent
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      A custom MCP tool that integrates Perplexity AI's API with Claude Desktop, allowing Claude to perform web-based research and provide answers with citations.
      1
      6
      MIT

    • Perplexity MCP Server

      shaunmacfullstack
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Exposes Perplexity AI's search capabilities to Claude, enabling real-time web search and information retrieval within the assistant. The project is currently in active development with plans to support Perplexity Spaces and multi-source data synthesis.
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap: checking deprecated code, finding APIs, getting documentation, and performing general searches. The descriptions make it easy for an agent to select the right tool for each specific research task.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Three tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (check_deprecated_code, find_apis, get_documentation), but 'search' deviates as a single verb without an object. This minor inconsistency slightly affects predictability, though all names remain readable.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 4 tools, the set feels thin for a research server that aims to cover broad information-gathering tasks. While each tool is useful, the scope suggests more specialized research operations could be missing, making it borderline appropriate.

    Completeness3/5

    The tools cover key research functions like checking deprecations, finding APIs, getting docs, and general searches, but there are notable gaps. For example, missing tools for comparing technologies, validating information sources, or tracking research progress limit comprehensive workflow coverage.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources