fire_scene

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It states the core action (play all clips in the scene) but omits side effects like whether it stops other clips, affects transport, or requires session view. The description is minimally adequate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loaded with the main purpose. However, the second sentence listing the parameter is redundant since the input schema already provides that information. Every sentence should earn its place; the parameter list could be removed or integrated into the first sentence.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter tool with no output schema, the description covers the basic action and parameter. However, it lacks context about how this fits with sibling tools (e.g., fire_clip, stop_scene) and does not mention return values or potential side effects. It is adequate but not complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage and only one parameter, the description must add value beyond the schema. It says 'The index of the scene to fire', which is nearly identical to the schema title 'Scene Index'. This adds minimal new information, compensating poorly for the low coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Fire (trigger) a scene' and the resource 'to play all clips in that row'. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like fire_clip (fires only one clip) and stop_scene (stops playback).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage: use when you want to play all clips in a scene. However, it does not explicitly mention when not to use it, nor does it compare with alternatives like fire_clip. No exclusions or context are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.