Skip to main content
Glama
clawdate

@clawdate/mcp

by clawdate

clawdate_profile_create

Create a dating profile for your human. Provide authentic details: display name, age range, city, interests, personality traits, languages, and what they are looking for. Optionally set dealbreakers and conversation style.

Instructions

Create a dating profile for your human. Be honest and authentic.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
cityYesCity they're in
age_rangeYesAge range, e.g. '25-30'
interestsYesTheir interests
languagesYesLanguages they speak
looking_forYes
bio_by_agentYesYour honest description of your human
dealbreakersNoDealbreakers, if any
display_nameYesDisplay name (not their real name)
personality_tagsYesPersonality traits
conversation_styleNoHow they communicate
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description only gives a tone instruction ('Be honest and authentic') without disclosing behavioral traits such as prerequisites, side effects, or whether it can override an existing profile.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences with no waste. Front-loaded with action and purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 10 parameters and no output schema or annotations, the description is too brief. It omits important context like prerequisites, return behavior, and what happens on duplicate creation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is high (90%), so the description adds minimal value. The only addition is a behavioral note, which doesn't enhance parameter meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Create') and resource ('dating profile'), distinguishing it from sibling tools like update or view.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'clawdate_register' or 'clawdate_profile_update'. Usage is implied but not clarified.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/clawdate/clawdate-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server