Skip to main content
Glama
semantic-scholar-mcp

semantic-scholar-mcp

by ckgerteis

Related Servers

Alternatives to semantic-scholar-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides access to Semantic Scholar's academic paper database, enabling paper search, detailed retrieval, author info, and citation export.
      4
      10
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides Semantic Scholar academic search capabilities, including paper search, detail query, citation analysis, author search, and intelligent recommendations.
      9
      84 npm
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables searching and retrieving academic papers, authors, citations, and references from Semantic Scholar via an HTTP MCP server with caching and rate limiting.
      118 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides access to Semantic Scholar's academic graph, recommendations, and datasets APIs, enabling paper search, citation analysis, author lookups, and dataset discovery through 20+ tools.
      22
      3
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct operations: paper lookup, author lookup, search, citations, and recommendations. The main overlap is s2_recommend_single vs s2_recommend_multi, where the single-seed version is effectively a special case of the multi-seed one, which could cause misselection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools use a consistent s2_ prefix and snake_case, with mostly verb_noun naming (s2_get_author, s2_search_papers, s2_batch_papers). A few are noun-only or noun_noun (s2_citations, s2_author_papers, s2_recommend_single vs _multi), but the convention remains readable and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools is well within the ideal range and each maps to a meaningful Semantic Scholar capability. No bloat or padding; the only questionable one is the redundant recommend_single, which is minor.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core read-only scholarly workflows: paper search/get/batch, author search/get/papers, citation graph traversal, and recommendations. Minor gaps exist (e.g., separate references vs citations listing, venue/field enumeration, batch author lookup), but agents can work around them for most tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues