jstage-mcp
jstage-mcp is a read-only FastMCP server that exposes Japan's J-STAGE WebAPI as three tools for searching Japanese journal literature and resolving article records with an auditable query ledger.
Full-text/article search (
jstage_search_articles): search J-STAGE articles by full text, author, title, journal, keywords, ISSN, abstract, affiliation, volume/issue, or publication year range (paginated 1–100 per page).DOI resolution (
jstage_get_article_by_doi): resolve a J-STAGE DOI (with or withoutdoi.orgprefix) to its full article record, or fall back to a doi.org URL for DOIs outside J-STAGE's issuance pattern.Journal spine navigation (
jstage_list_issues): retrieve the volume/issue structure of a known journal by material title, ISSN, orcdjournalcode.Bilingual metadata: returns English and Japanese titles, authors, and journal names where J-STAGE provides them, plus required JST attribution in every response.
Diagnostics and receipts: every envelope reports search method (
searched_for,matching_mode,result.breadth,matched_in) and diagnostic codes (e.g.BROAD_FULLTEXT,SCRIPT_LATIN_QUERY,API_ERROR), optionally deposited to a hash-chained JSONL ledger for citable, re-runnable searches.Not available: no journal-search tool (
service=4is rejected by the live API withERR_004); rate-limited to one outbound request per second, no bulk downloads, and commercial use requires JST registration.Client-agnostic: works over MCP stdio with Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code, Zed, LibreChat, or any custom MCP client.
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@jstage-mcpsearch for articles on CRISPR gene editing"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
jstage-mcp
A FastMCP stdio server exposing the J-STAGE WebAPI as three tools for use with Claude Desktop.
What this is for
J-STAGE holds the full text of journals published by Japanese learned societies, and this searches inside the articles rather than across a catalogue. A term that no cataloguer chose as a keyword is still findable if an author used it in an argument, which makes this the route for concepts that circulate before they are named.
Resolve a J-STAGE DOI straight to its record, or walk a journal's volume and issue spine to see a run whole.
Run a term here and on cinii-mcp and read the gap: a wide divergence tells you whether your vocabulary belongs to catalogue description or to the prose of the field, which is a finding about the literature before it is a finding in it.
Related MCP server: Japan Data MCP
What the receipts are for
A search you cannot re-run is a claim you cannot check. When a footnote rests on a database query, say that no article in this index uses a term before a certain year, the reader is asked to take the search on trust: which term, in which script, on what date, against which index and which version of it, and how far down the results the author went. Ordinary searching leaves none of that behind. This server leaves all of it. Every query-answering tool returns its envelope through the ledger, which appends one line to an append-only file: the term actually sent and its script, how the source matched it, how many records existed and how many came back, the diagnostics, the tool and its parameters, the server version, a timestamp, and the hash of the previous line. The hash makes the file a chain: a line cannot be altered, removed or reordered afterwards without the verifier saying so.
What that gives a researcher:
A citable search. Name the receipt in the footnote (session slug, server, date, line hash) and a reader can see exactly what was asked and run it again against the same version.
Negative findings that carry weight. "Not found" is evidence only if the search that produced it is on record, with its term, its script and its breadth.
A method section that writes itself.
jstage-mcp-ledgermanifest <folder>summarises every query a project made, by server, script and session: the disclosure a journal, a data-availability statement or a research-integrity review asks for.A record of AI-mediated research. When a model chose the term, the receipt shows the term it chose and what came back, which is the thing to disclose about work done with an assistant.
Nothing interpreted. The receipt is the source's own answer with credentials removed. The server does not summarise, rank or paraphrase, so the record is of the source, not of the tool.
Receipts are off until you name a folder (MCP_RECEIPT_DIR); each server then writes its own
<server>.jsonl inside it, and MCP_RECEIPT_SESSION stamps a project or article slug on every
line so one folder can serve several projects. jstage-mcp-ledger verify-dir <folder> checks the chains.
The mechanics, the variables and what the envelope says when nothing is deposited are in the
receipts section below.
Tools
Tool | Purpose |
| Full-text / author / title / journal search across J-STAGE articles |
| Volume & issue spine for a known title, ISSN, or |
| Resolve a J-STAGE DOI to its full article record |
All tools return one typed JSON response envelope with bilingual (English / Japanese) titles, authors, and journal names where J-STAGE provides them — see Response format below. The JST attribution requirement is met by the envelope's attribution field, present in every response.
Response format
Every tool returns one JSON response envelope, built by mediation.py and defined in response-schema.json. Schema version 2.3.0. The same module and schema are vendored byte-identically across the server family, so an envelope from one server can be read by a consumer written for another.
The envelope reports how the search was made, not only what it found:
searched_for— on search operations, the term actually sent, its detected script, and the matching mode, hoisted to the top of the envelope so a relaying client cannot drop it. Fetch operations (jstage_get_article_by_doi,jstage_list_issues) omit it: they were handed an identifier and chose no term.query—input_termsas supplied,normalizedas sent, and the detectedscript. This pair is the record of any rendering performed between the caller's language and the corpus.matching_mode—full_text_broadfor this server. It tells you how to readresult.total.result.breadth—none,narrow(1–50),broad(51–1000),very_broad(>1000). Thresholds are low on purpose: a few hundred hits that look like a literature are marked rather than passed through clean.items[].matched_in— which field the match was made in, per record.receipt— an ISO 8601 timestamp, a SHA-256 taken over the normalised query and its parameters, and the identifiers returned. The hash verifies a term you already hold; it cannot be inverted to produce one, so the unit of deposit is the envelope, not the receipt.attribution— the required credit line, in every response.
Diagnostic codes
Typed and closed. A diagnostic is never prose the client has to parse.
Code | Level | Meaning |
| info | Records returned; nothing to flag. |
| warning | The match was made on full text, where multi-word terms are matched loosely, so a high |
| warning | The query was Latin-script, so it matched Latin-script text and metadata only (English-language articles and romanised fields), not the Japanese-language corpus. Re-issue in kanji or kana. |
| warning | No records for this rendering. Try an emic or component term, or an alternative Japanese rendering. |
| error | The API answered, and answered with an error — including an HTTP error status. The result is unknown, not empty. |
| error | The request did not complete. Kept distinct from |
| info | The response was not written to the query ledger, because no receipts destination is configured. The search is unaffected; no receipt survives it. |
| warning | A receipts destination is set, the write was attempted, and it did not land. Distinct from the line above because one is a choice and the other is a fault. |
Query receipts
Every envelope can be deposited to an append-only, hash-chained JSONL log by ledger.py. It is off unless MCP_RECEIPT_DIR (or the legacy MCP_RECEIPT_LOG) is set, and a logging failure is swallowed rather than raised — a search matters more than the record of it. Secrets are redacted before a line is composed.
Since schema 2.3.0 the envelope says so. When a response is not deposited, emit() appends RECEIPT_NOT_DEPOSITED if the variable is unset, or RECEIPT_WRITE_FAILED if it is set and the write did not land. The gap is then visible in the artefact that becomes the record, rather than only in a configuration file. mediation.deposit_enabled() reports the same fact on demand.
MCP_RECEIPT_DIR=C:\path\to\receipts # a folder, not a file
MCP_RECEIPT_SESSION=project-or-article-slug
MCP_RECEIPT_STRICT=1 # optional: make logging failure raise
MCP_RECEIPT_LOG=C:\path\to\receipts.jsonl # legacy single file; ignored when _DIR is setA folder, and one file per server. MCP_RECEIPT_DIR points at a directory
and each server writes its own <server>.jsonl inside it. That is not tidiness.
Appending is read-the-last-hash-then-write, and the lock around it is a threading
lock, which holds within one process and not between several — six servers are
six processes, and two answering at the same moment will both read the same
predecessor and both claim it. Measured, not theorised: six processes writing 150
lines to one file produced fourteen forks. MCP_RECEIPT_LOG still works and is
still correct for a single server; it is the wrong shape for a family.
install.ps1 sets this up for all six and writes a README into the folder.
Verify one chain, or the whole folder:
jstage-mcp-ledger verify receipts/jstage.jsonl
jstage-mcp-ledger verify-dir receipts
jstage-mcp-ledger manifest receipts # writes receipts/manifest.jsonverify exits non-zero on failure and says which kind it found: a fork
(concurrent writers — a configuration fault, and every line is still there), a
missing line, a reordering, or tamper (a line that does not hash to
its own content). Only the last is a claim about honesty, and reporting them
alike would invite a reader to mistake one for the other. The manifest is the
object to cite: one description of the whole deposit — per-file line counts,
first and last timestamps, terminal hashes, and combined totals by server,
script and session.
Install
Three routes. All three give you the same server; pick by how much you want to see of it.
Python. The pip and source routes need Python 3.10 or later; 3.10, 3.12, 3.13 and 3.14 are tested in CI on Windows, macOS and Linux. The Claude Desktop bundle uses whichever of these is already installed, and has uv download one only if none is.
Getting Python
Every route needs Python 3.10 to 3.14. The Claude Desktop bundle uses one already on the machine
and has uv download one only if none is; the other routes also need the venv module, which the
official installers include.
Windows. Download the 64-bit installer from python.org/downloads and run it; tick "Add python.exe to PATH" on the first screen. Afterwards
py --version(the launcher the installer adds) orpython --versionin a new terminal should print 3.1x. If typingpythonopens the Microsoft Store instead, Windows has no Python yet: that Store page is a stub, and it is also what "'python' is not recognized" usually means.macOS. The python.org installer, or
brew install python@3.13with Homebrew. The/usr/bin/python3that Xcode's command-line tools provide may be older than 3.10;python3 --versionsays.Linux. Your distribution's package:
sudo apt install python3 python3-venvon Debian and Ubuntu,sudo dnf install python3on Fedora. Or let uv provide one (next line).Any platform, with uv. uv installs Python itself:
uv python install 3.13, thenuv venvor theuvxroute below.
One click: the Claude Desktop bundle
Download jstage-mcp-3.1.2.mcpb from the latest release and open it; Claude Desktop installs it. One bundle serves Windows, macOS (Apple Silicon and Intel) and Linux. Claude Desktop asks only for a receipts folder at install time.
The bundle carries the server's source and a lock file, nothing compiled, and needs no Python of its own. Claude Desktop builds the bundle's environment when you install it, with uv, a copy already on your PATH if there is one and otherwise one the app downloads for itself: uv takes a Python 3.10 or later already on the machine, downloads one only if there is none, and installs the locked libraries, roughly 40 MB, behind the install progress bar. Every launch then reuses that environment and takes under a second. Bundles 3.1.0 and 3.1.1 kept pyproject.toml one folder down, which made Claude Desktop skip that install step and download everything during the first connection attempt instead; on a slow or filtered network that attempt never completed and the app reported it could not connect to the extension server. Bundles before 3.1.0 vendored libraries compiled for CPython 3.12 only and failed on every other interpreter. See Troubleshooting.
From GitHub, pinned to a release
pip install "git+https://github.com/ckgerteis/jstage-mcp@v3.1.2"
# or, without an environment of your own:
uvx --from "git+https://github.com/ckgerteis/jstage-mcp@v3.1.2" jstage-mcpinstalls the jstage-mcp console script and jstage-mcp-ledger. The tag is the thing to cite; @main gets whatever is current. Then register it in Claude Desktop (below), or let install.py do that.
The whole family
pip install "git+https://github.com/ckgerteis/bibliograph-mcp@v1.0.4" && bibliograph installinstalls all six servers and registers them together — one receipts folder, credentials asked for once. See bibliograph-mcp. From a checkout of this repository, python install.py does the same for this server alone, python install.py --all for the six, on Windows, macOS and Linux; install.ps1 remains for Windows.
From source
python3 -m venv .venv
.venv/bin/pip install .On Windows:
py -3.11 -m venv .venv
.venv\Scripts\pip.exe install .Or straight from the repository, without cloning:
uvx --from "git+https://github.com/ckgerteis/jstage-mcp" jstage-mcpVerify the install:
.venv/bin/python -c "import jstage_mcp; print(jstage_mcp.__version__)"That fails loudly if the package or one of its vendored modules is missing. Do
not use jstage-mcp --help as the check: unknown arguments are ignored, the
server starts, reads end-of-input and exits 0, so it reports success whatever
the state of the code.
Installing more than this one
Six independent packages. None imports another, none depends on another, and
each installs and answers on its own — pip install . in this directory is a
complete install of this server and nothing else.
They do share three things: a response envelope, a query ledger, and — if you
run more than one — a receipts folder. install.ps1 is vendored byte-identical
into all six and handles that on Windows; install.py is its cross-platform port. Both install this server by default, because
cloning one repository is not a request for five more.
.\install.ps1 # this server
.\install.ps1 -All # all six
.\install.ps1 -Servers jstage,cinii # a chosen subsetNothing about where things go is decided for you. The script asks where to
install (the virtual environment Claude Desktop will be pointed at), which
folder receives the receipts, and which session slug to stamp on them,
offering a neutral suggestion for each that Enter accepts; run without a
terminal it does not guess, and stops unless --venv and --receipts-dir
(or --no-receipts; -VenvDir and -ReceiptsDir for install.ps1) say
so. Whatever subset you name is registered against one receipts folder, asked for
once. The script prefers a sibling checkout to the network, carries across
credentials already registered rather than asking again, leaves servers it was
not asked about alone, and stops rather than guessing where the servers already
registered disagree about the folder or the session slug. It also asserts that
ledger.py and mediation.py are byte-identical across everything it
installed, so two envelope versions cannot end up in one environment unnoticed.
Any other MCP client
Nothing here is specific to Claude. The server speaks the Model Context Protocol over stdio and nothing else: any client that can start a process and talk JSON-RPC to it (Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code and Continue, Zed, LibreChat, a script of your own using an MCP SDK) can use it. The Claude Desktop bundle and the installers are conveniences for one client; the server underneath is the same console script. Register it anywhere by giving the client the absolute path of the console script and, optionally, the environment:
{
"mcpServers": {
"jstage": {
"command": "/absolute/path/to/.venv/bin/jstage-mcp",
"env": {
"MCP_RECEIPT_DIR": "/absolute/path/to/receipts",
"MCP_RECEIPT_SESSION": "project-or-article-slug"
}
}
}
}Claude Code takes the same thing on the command line:
claude mcp add jstage -- /absolute/path/to/.venv/bin/jstage-mcpOn Windows the path ends in \.venv\Scripts\jstage-mcp.exe. MCP_RECEIPT_DIR and MCP_RECEIPT_SESSION
are optional; without them the server runs and every envelope says RECEIPT_NOT_DEPOSITED. The
stdio transport is the only one: there is no HTTP endpoint to expose, and nothing to host.
Troubleshooting
"Server disconnected" is all Claude Desktop says when the server process exited before or during the handshake, whatever the reason. The reason is in the log:
Windows:
%LOCALAPPDATA%\Claude\Logs\mcp-server-<name>.log(builds before August 2026:%APPDATA%\Claude\logs) (the extension's display name, or the key undermcpServers), withmcp.logbeside it for the app's side of the conversation.macOS:
~/Library/Logs/Claude/mcp-server-<name>.logandmcp.log.Linux:
~/.config/Claude/logs/.
Read the last launch from the bottom up. Three shapes account for nearly every report:
A Python traceback ending in
ImportErrororModuleNotFoundError(for exampleNo module named 'pydantic_core._pydantic_core'). The interpreter started, the code was found, and a compiled library did not match that interpreter. This is what every bundle before 3.1.0 did on any Python other than 3.12. Install the current bundle, or use the pip route, which resolves wheels for the interpreter you install into.'python' is not recognized,spawn python ENOENT, or a line from the Microsoft Store: no interpreter was found on the PATH Claude Desktop constructs. Nothing of this server ran. The current bundle does not launchpythonat all; for the pip route, register the console script by absolute path as shown above.A line from uv (
error: ..., or a download that never finished), orUnable to connect to extension serverwith nothing from the server in the log: the environment was not built. From 3.1.2 the app builds it at install time; look inmain.logbeside the server log for lines tagged[UV Runtime], which record the download and theuv sync, and formissing pyproject.toml, which means a bundle older than 3.1.2. If the install-time build failed (no network, a proxy that blocks github.com or pypi.org), reinstall the bundle once the network is back; the launch also rebuilds the environment itself, so a second launch on a working network completes.
The bundle's own entry point writes one line naming the interpreter, its path and the supported range before re-raising an import failure, so a log from 3.1.0 onwards says which of these it is.
Claude Desktop configuration
Add an entry to %APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json under
mcpServers, pointing at the console script in the environment you installed
into. On macOS or Linux use the absolute path to .venv/bin/jstage-mcp.
{
"mcpServers": {
"jstage": {
"command": "C:\\path\\to\\.venv\\Scripts\\jstage-mcp.exe"
}
}
}Changed in 3.0.0. Earlier versions were registered by path —
"command": "…\\python.exe", "args": ["…\\server.py"]. That entry will not
start this version, because server.py is now a module inside a package rather
than a script beside its imports. Replace it with the console script above.
Restart Claude Desktop. The three tools should appear under "jstage" in the tool list.
Rate limiting
The server enforces a one-second minimum interval between outbound requests in line with JST's prohibition on bulk downloads. The limit is per-process; if you run multiple Claude Desktop sessions concurrently you may exceed it, so don't.
Limitations
There is no journal-search tool.
jstage_search_journalsexisted in v1.x and was removed in v2.0.0. J-STAGE announced a journal-search endpoint (service=4) on 26 March 2026 and the public API still rejects that service code withERR_004; a tool that silently falls back to volume search is not a journal search, and this server would rather not offer one. Until JST activatesservice=4, usejstage_list_issuesagainst a known title, ISSN orcdjournal.jstage_get_article_by_doirequires J-STAGE-issued DOIs. The WebAPI does not expose adoi=query parameter. The tool decomposes DOIs that follow J-STAGE's pattern (10.<registrant>/<cdjournal>.<vol>.<no>_<page>) intocdjournal+voland matches the result against the response. For DOIs outside that pattern the tool returns the doi.org resolution URL with a note.Commercial use requires registration. Per the JST Terms of Use, commercial use needs an application form sent to
contact@jstage.jst.go.jp. Research and teaching use does not.
API notes
Endpoint: https://api.jstage.jst.go.jp/searchapi/do
Service codes used:
service=2— Volumes/issuesservice=3— Article searchservice=4— Journal search (documented, rejected withERR_004as of 23 August 2026; not used by any tool)
Valid article-search query parameters confirmed against the live API:
material, article, author, affil, keyword, abst, text, issn, cdjournal, vol, no, pubyearfrom, pubyearto, start, count.
Attribution
Powered by J-STAGE
This string is included in every tool response.
Citation
If this software supports your research, please cite it. See CITATION.cff, or use the "Cite this repository" button on GitHub.
Tests
.venv/bin/python tests/smoke_stdio.pyStarts the installed console script over stdio, performs the MCP handshake, and checks tools/list against the tool table above; exits non-zero on a mismatch. RUN_LIVE=1 … <tool> '<json params>' adds one live call and reports the envelope's diagnostic codes.
License
MIT © 2026 Christopher Gerteis.
This license covers the server code only. It grants no rights over J-STAGE content or the J-STAGE WebAPI, which remain governed by JST's Terms of Use.
Disclaimer
A research tool, maintained on a best-effort basis and provided "as is", without warranty. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the Japan Science and Technology Agency. JST does not provide support for the WebAPI.
Author
Dr Christopher Gerteis, SOAS University of London.
Available Tools
3 toolsjstage_get_article_by_doiARead-onlyIdempotent
Resolve a J-STAGE DOI to its article record. Returns the unified envelope (operation 'resolve_doi') with one item on success, or zero items plus a diagnostic when the DOI is not in J-STAGE's issuance pattern or is unmatched.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| params | Yes |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already establish read-only/idempotent/non-destructive behavior. The description adds meaningful behavioral context beyond annotations by specifying the response envelope, the operation name ('resolve_doi'), and the success/failure contract (one item vs. zero items plus diagnostic). This clarifies what happens in edge cases, which is not covered by annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is two sentences, front-loaded with the primary purpose and then the response behavior. There is no redundancy or unnecessary detail. Every sentence contributes to understanding the tool's function and outcomes.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simplicity (one parameter) and the presence of an output schema, the description covers the essential aspects: the operation, success/failure representation, and error handling. It does not mention pagination or other complexities because they are not applicable. The schema description handles the parameter format. Overall, it is complete for an agent to use the tool correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema description for the 'doi' parameter already explains that it can be with or without the doi.org prefix, providing semantic meaning. Although the context signal says schema description coverage is 0%, the actual schema includes a description, so the baseline of 3 applies. The tool description adds no additional parameter information beyond what the schema provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description explicitly states the verb 'resolve' and the resource 'a J-STAGE DOI to its article record.' It is specific and clearly distinguishes from the siblings (search_articles and list_issues) by focusing on DOI-based lookup. The purpose is immediately understandable.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description does not explicitly mention when to use this tool versus the alternatives. However, the purpose (DOI to article) strongly implies usage when a DOI is available. There are no explicit exclusions or comparisons to siblings, so guidance is only implied, not stated.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
jstage_list_issuesARead-onlyIdempotent
Return the volume/issue spine of a journal (by material/issn/cdjournal).
Navigation aid, not literature retrieval: returns structural JSON (volumes with publisher/journal metadata), not the record envelope.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| params | Yes |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint=false, so the description does not repeat those. It adds useful behavioral context: the return is 'structural JSON (volumes with publisher/journal metadata), not the record envelope'. This clarifies the nature of the output beyond what annotations capture and reinforces the navigation-purpose distinction. It does not contradict any annotation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is two short sentences, front-loaded with the core purpose, and immediately clarifies what it is not. Every word earns its place; there is no redundant or vague language.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool is relatively simple (one params object) and the description covers the essential purpose and output shape. An output schema exists, so the detailed return structure is likely defined elsewhere. The description could elaborate on pagination (count/start) or use cases, but for a navigation aid the current level is adequate. The only minor gap is not mentioning the filtering options beyond identifiers, but they are in the schema.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0% (description does not discuss the parameters object). The description mentions 'by material/issn/cdjournal', covering three of the seven fields, but omits count, start, pubyearfrom, and pubyearto. Given the low coverage, the description should compensate more, but it does highlight the primary identifiers. The schema itself provides titles and constraints for the remaining fields, so this is a partial compensation.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states a specific verb and resource: 'Return the volume/issue spine of a journal'. It also differentiates from siblings by asserting it is a 'Navigation aid, not literature retrieval', which precisely matches the listing vs. search/article functions. This leaves no ambiguity about what the tool does.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides clear context: this is for navigation, not literature retrieval. It implies when to use it (when you need the structural spine) and when not (for literature retrieval, likely using search or get-article siblings). It also names the key identifiers ('by material/issn/cdjournal') but does not explicitly mention alternative tool names or exact conditions for choosing this over siblings. This is close to full guidance, but not explicit exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
jstage_search_articlesARead-onlyIdempotent
Search articles on J-STAGE. Returns the unified response envelope.
J-STAGE matches text against full text and treats multi-word terms
loosely, so a high result.total is often noisy — read matching_mode
(full_text_broad), result.breadth, and the diagnostics before treating
a count as the size of a literature. A SCRIPT_LATIN_QUERY diagnostic means
the query matched Latin-script text and metadata only; re-issue in kanji/kana. The same
string can return very different totals on CiNii (metadata conjunction).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| params | Yes |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, openWorldHint, idempotentHint, and non-destructive behavior, so the bar is lower, and the description still adds substantial context. It explains full-text broad matching, loose multi-word handling, the meaning of matching_mode/result.breadth/diagnostics, SCRIPT_LATIN_QUERY implications, and differences from CiNii. This goes far beyond the structured annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is front-loaded with the core purpose and then provides a dense but relevant paragraph of caveats. Every sentence earns its place, with no filler or repetition of annotation information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the search tool's complexity and the existing output schema, the description covers the response envelope, diagnostics, matching behavior, and cross-source caveats. It does not explicitly address when to choose this tool over siblings or provide examples, but the essential invocation and result-interpretation context is present.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0% at the top level, but the nested schema properties have individual descriptions. The tool description adds meaningful semantics for the central text parameter, explaining full-text matching, noise, and re-issuing in kanji/kana, which is not in the schema. It does not discuss filters or pagination, but those are covered in the nested schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description opens with 'Search articles on J-STAGE' and 'Returns the unified response envelope,' clearly stating the verb, resource, and scope. It is distinguishable from siblings like jstage_list_issues and jstage_get_article_by_doi by the search focus, though it does not explicitly contrast itself with them.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description gives practical guidance for interpreting noisy results and re-issuing Latin-script queries in kanji/kana, which helps an agent act after receiving results. However, it does not explicitly state when to prefer this tool over the sibling tools or when not to use it, so usage selection is implied rather than explicit.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
3 tool updates
v3.0.0- First observed
jstage_get_article_by_doi - First observed
jstage_list_issues - First observed
jstage_search_articles
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool targets a distinct operation: full-text search, DOI resolution, and journal issue navigation. There is no real overlap between query-based retrieval and known-identifier lookup, and list_issues is explicitly separated from article record retrieval.
All tool names follow a consistent jstage_<verb>_<object> pattern using snake_case and a shared prefix. The verbs search, get, and list are predictable and clearly map to their respective actions.
Three tools is at the lower end of a well-scoped range, but each tool earns its place by covering a core workflow. The count feels minimal yet sufficient for a focused J-STAGE article server.
Core discovery workflows are covered: searching articles, resolving a DOI, and navigating journal issues. Minor gaps exist for directly listing articles inside a specific issue or retrieving articles by non-DOI identifiers, but these are workable via search.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Search 150M+ academic works, journals, and funders via Crossref API.
Google Scholar search results, citation counts and citation export formats, as structured JSON.
Wikipedia, Wikidata and Wiktionary as clean JSON, not HTML. 1.9M searchable. Free, no auth.
Resolve DOIs, search ~155M scholarly works, and fetch references via the Crossref REST API.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables querying Japan's national academic database, CiNii Research, for articles, books, dissertations, KAKEN projects, and researcher profiles via seven MCP tools.72MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to query Japanese public data (laws, corporations, statistics) from official government APIs, returning normalized English metadata with source attribution.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables searching CiNii Research for academic articles, books, grants, and research data, and retrieving metadata for individual items.2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables scholarly metadata lookups from the Crossref REST API, including works, members, journals, funders, types, licenses, and prefixes, as tools for LLM clients.1825 PyPIMIT