Skip to main content
Glama
cinii-mcp

cinii-mcp

by ckgerteis

Related Servers

Alternatives to cinii-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables searching CiNii Research for academic articles, books, grants, and research data, and retrieving metadata for individual items.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables searching and retrieving academic articles from CiNii, Japan's largest bibliographic database, with support for advanced filtering, sorting, and search range options.
      1
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs and compatible clients to search academic papers, retrieve detailed metadata and abstracts, access full-text content when available, and perform topic searches with optional date filters via MCP tools.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables users to search academic papers, analyze citation networks, retrieve author details and publication histories, and get paper recommendations through a unified MCP interface.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables searching and retrieving academic papers, author profiles, citation and reference networks, recommendations, and related metadata from the Semantic Scholar API through MCP tools.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server for Japanese literature research that provides unified search across NDL, CiNii, J-STAGE, and other Japanese academic databases, with Skills to assist in search planning and result evaluation.
      30
      502 npm
      8
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are partitioned mostly by record type (books, articles, dissertations, data, kaken, researchers, libraries, holdings), which gives clear primary boundaries. The main overlap is between cinii_search_all, cinii_search_kaken, and cinii_search_projects_and_products, which all return mixed/project records and require reading descriptions to choose correctly; well-written descriptions mitigate this rather than eliminate it.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool follows the same cinii_<verb>_<noun> snake_case pattern: search_books, search_articles, get_holdings, get_record, etc. Verbs are used consistently (search_ for queries, get_ for single-resource fetches), so the convention is fully predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eleven tools map cleanly onto the distinct CiNii content types plus the two NACSIS-CAT auxiliary operations (holdings, libraries) and a single-record fetch. Each tool has a recognizable domain slice and none appear redundant enough to remove.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers search across all major record types, single-record retrieval by CRID/URL, ISBN/NCID lookup, library lookup, and holdings — a coherent discovery lifecycle. Minor gaps exist (no citation/export or bulk record retrieval, no explicit researcher-by-ID fetch aside from search), but agents can work around these.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues