No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 15 tools
Tools are generally well-distinguished by action (assess, list, run, import, generate, scan, validate) and resource. However, anjian_doctor, anjian_capability_plan, and anjian_list_assessments all touch capability/status inspection and could occasionally confuse an agent about which to use for checking system state.
All tools share the anjian_ prefix with snake_case, showing consistency. However, the naming is inconsistent in granularity and verb style: some use domain-specific verbs (consolidate, validate_observation, import_pcap) while others are action-focused (run, list, create, get). The nouns range from concrete (assessment, target) to abstract (doctor, consolidate), lacking a uniform verb_noun pattern.
At 15 tools, this is near the high end of the ideal range but reasonable for a security assessment platform covering assessment lifecycle, evidence import, analysis, and reporting. Each tool serves a distinct stage of the workflow. Slightly heavy but justifiable given the breadth of the domain.
The surface covers the full assessment lifecycle: create/get/list/run assessments, import evidence (Burp/HAR/PCAP/source), consolidate, validate, and generate reports. Minor gaps include no explicit tool for deleting/deprecating assessments or managing report history/cleanup, and no dedicated tool for listing imported evidence, but agents can work around these.