Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Fluxmail

Related Servers

  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Self-hosted MCP server for any IMAP/SMTP inbox. Multi-account in one config. Built for Claude Code.
    -
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    A minimal MCP server for reading, searching, managing, and sending email over IMAP and SMTP.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    A self-hosted MCP server for Gmail and Outlook that lets MCP clients read, search, send, reply, and manage email via OAuth, with no built-in secrets and support for both stdio and HTTP transports.
    19 npm
    ISC
  • F
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A lightweight MCP server for personal Microsoft Outlook/Hotmail accounts, enabling email search, reading, attachment management, and folder operations via Microsoft Graph API with OAuth device-code flow.
    6
    1
    -
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A minimal MCP server for reading and sending emails via IMAP/SMTP, supporting multiple accounts in a single instance with zero external dependencies.
    1
    -
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    A self-hostable Gmail MCP server that enables Gmail search/read, sending, replies, drafts, labels, and attachment downloads via MCP tools with OAuth authorization. Supports stdio and streamable HTTP transports.
    1
    MIT

TDQS

A3.7/5.0

Scored across 19 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Most tools target distinct resources and actions: list_emails is for browsing, search_emails is for query syntax, and get_email/get_thread retrieve full content. The only mild ambiguity is between list_emails and search_emails since both can filter by conditions, but their descriptions clarify the intended use.

Naming Consistency5/5

Every tool follows the same snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_accounts, get_email, create_draft, cancel_scheduled_email, download_attachment). Names are predictable and map clearly to their operations.

Tool Count4/5

19 tools is slightly above the typical 3-15 sweet spot, but each tool covers a distinct email operation and the count is appropriate for the domain. There is no obvious filler or redundancy.

Completeness5/5

The tool surface covers the full email lifecycle: browsing, searching, reading, drafting, sending, scheduling, forwarding, modifying, and attachments. It also handles account-level introspection and failure recovery via get_status, so agents have no dead-end workflows.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessNo issues