Skip to main content
Glama

Verify State after Reload

verify_persistence
Destructive

After any change, force a fresh page load to confirm whether text appears or disappears, verifying true server-side persistence.

Instructions

Force a fresh page load and report whether target_text is present or absent — your tool for catching the "Saved!" toast that lied.

After any destructive or persistence-changing action (delete, edit, save, submit, toggle, payment, etc.), the success toast is not proof. Only a fresh GET on the relevant page is. This tool does that GET and reports presence — you decide whether the result matches what you expected.

Examples: verify_persistence("absent", "Buy groceries", "/tasks") — after deleting "Buy groceries", confirm it's gone from the list. verify_persistence("present", "EDITED-VALUE-XYZ", "/tasks/1/edit") — after editing, confirm the new value reloads.

Argus does not auto-record a bug here. If presence does not match your expectation, call record_bug.

Args: expect: "present" or "absent" — what state the target_text should be in after the fresh page load. target_text: The text or value you're checking for. after_url: Page to load and inspect. Defaults to the current URL. clear_storage: When True, wipe localStorage/sessionStorage before the reload so you test TRUE server persistence — a "Save" that only wrote client storage will read absent (data would be lost on another device/browser). Default False keeps client storage (proves server-backed truth without logging out). Use True when the feature is supposed to persist to a server/account. If clearing logs the app out, the result is unreliable — re-check without it.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
expectYes
after_urlNo
target_textYes
clear_storageNo

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate destructiveHint=true, but description adds critical details: it forces a fresh GET, clears storage optionally (with explanation of impact including potential logout), and states that Argus does not auto-record bugs. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Well-structured with clear sections, examples, and front-loaded essential information. Every sentence adds value; no fluff. Length is justified by the need to explain parameters and usage nuances.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With output schema present, description covers all necessary aspects: purpose, usage guidelines, parameter semantics, behavioral effects, and fallback to record_bug. Handles edge cases like clear_storage causing logout. Highly complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, but description fully explains each parameter: expect (present/absent), target_text (what to check), after_url (page to load, defaults to current URL), clear_storage (wipes client storage with detailed effect implications). Compensates completely for missing schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description explicitly states 'Force a fresh page load and report whether target_text is present or absent', clearly identifying verb (verify) and resource (state after reload). Distinguishes itself from siblings by positioning as the tool for catching misleading success toasts after persistence-changing actions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit context: use after destructive/persistence-changing actions, and when not to trust success toasts. Includes two examples and directs to call record_bug on mismatch. Lacks explicit 'when not to use' statement, but context is sufficiently clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/chriswu727/argus'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server