Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Argus

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Browser-based QA testing for AI-built software. Agents open real browsers (via Selenium), navigate pages, fill forms, click buttons, and report findings. Two modes: targeted tests (30-90s) and full-site discovery scans (3-15min).
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to drive a real browser like a person — crawling every page and role, running real user journeys, and auditing controls a DOM-based test misses — so UI, accessibility and permission bugs are found and only the screens affected by recent changes are re-tested. Runs are script-driven and read-only by default, so testing costs no model tokens and nothing about the app is sent to an AI.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI to perform real-browser QA testing on websites via Playwright, finding bugs, accessibility, SEO, and performance issues through natural language conversations.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Point your coding agent at a URL and get a real-browser QA audit: broken signup/login/checkout flows, JS console errors, missing analytics, consent + security headers, mobile tap targets, and accessibility — returned as machine-verified findings graded A-F.
      44
      22 PyPI
      2
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 29 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clear, distinct roles within browser QA: navigation, interaction, evidence capture, recording, and coverage. There is some overlap between click_what and test_action, and between verify_persistence and record_bug's verify path, but the descriptions generally make the intended choice clear.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names use snake_case, but the naming conventions are mixed: verb-first tools like click_what and type_into, bare verbs like navigate and observe, and noun-first forms like capsule_save, coverage_update, and regression_check. The names remain readable, but the pattern is not predictable across the set.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 29 tools, the surface is quite heavy for a single MCP server and exceeds typical well-scoped ranges. While the domain is broad, several low-level controls such as resize, scroll_down, go_back, and press_key could be consolidated into broader interaction tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers the core exploratory testing lifecycle: session start/end, navigation, interactions, form submission, responsive emulation, screenshots, error capture, persistence checks, regression checks, coverage, and test export. Minor gaps such as forward history, drag-and-drop, or explicit multi-tab handling are not fatal for most workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues