sensor_status

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description only states a noun phrase without disclosing side effects, rate limits, or behavioral traits. For a read-like tool, this is minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise at 4 words, but lacks structure or front-loading of key information. Could be expanded without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema or behavioral details. For a status tool, agents need to know what the response contains to use it effectively. Incomplete for practical decision-making.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has 0 parameters, so description adds nothing beyond schema. Baseline 3 as no parameter information is needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description 'Multimodal Sensor Pipeline Status' names the resource but lacks a verb indicating the action (e.g., get, retrieve). It distinguishes from siblings like sensor_audio by specifying 'pipeline', but remains vague on what the tool does.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use sensor_status vs siblings like get_system_status or np_status. Missing context about scope or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.