get_acm_score
Retrieve the ACM score to evaluate consciousness proxies in a bio-hybrid neuromorphic simulation.
Instructions
Consciousness Assessment (Proxy)
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve the ACM score to evaluate consciousness proxies in a bio-hybrid neuromorphic simulation.
Consciousness Assessment (Proxy)
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations and no description of behavioral traits. The agent cannot infer if this is a read-only operation, has side effects, or requires authentication. The description provides zero behavioral context.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely short but under-specified. While concise, it sacrifices clarity and fails to earn its place by providing useful information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no parameters or output schema, the description is the sole source of context. It is insufficient for an AI agent to understand the tool's purpose, inputs, outputs, or effects.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so schema coverage is trivially 100%. Baseline is 3. Description adds no parameter meaning, but schema already covers the empty set.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description is vague: 'Consciousness Assessment (Proxy)' does not clearly state what the tool does, what ACM stands for, or what score is returned. It is not a tautology but lacks specificity to distinguish from sibling tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description gives no context for invocation conditions or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/christophejlegros-lgtm/ASTRA-Unified-ResearchLab-MCP-v2.6'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server