A
licenseA
qualityC
maintenanceMCP server providing comprehensive Korean legal data access (laws, precedents, regulations, ordinances) with citation verification, temporal comparison, impact graphs, and legal research workflows.
10
4,664 npm
MIT
korean-law-mcp
by chrisryugj
Related Servers
Alternatives to korean-law-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Korean legal research, offering access to statutes, precedents, administrative rules, citation verification, and legal analysis through 10 tools.104,664 npmMIT
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Korean National Law Information. Enables searching and retrieving Korean laws, English-translated laws, administrative rules, court precedents, and constitutional decisions via 54 MCP tools.54-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides Korean legal information through 10 tools, including statutes, precedents, administrative rules, and citation verification with hallucination prevention, enabling legal research and analysis via AI assistants or CLI.104,664 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceThis MCP server provides Korean legal search tools for finding judgments, statutes, and sentencing statistics, and computing sentencing ranges.41MIT
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceSearch, compare, and analyze Korean national laws and public institution internal regulations via MCP.100107 npm2MIT
TDQS
A3.9/5.0
Scored across 10 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools have distinct roles: search_law (find IDs), get_law_text (retrieve text), search_decisions (search) vs get_decision_text (retrieve), etc. However legal_research is a broad catch-all that overlaps with search_law/get_law_text for natural-language queries, and legal_analysis's multiple modes (verify_citations, impact_map) partially overlap with legal_research scenarios, requiring the descriptions to disambiguate.
Naming Consistency4/5
A clear verb_noun pattern dominates (search_law, get_law_text, get_annexes, get_decision_text, search_decisions, discover_tools, execute_tool). A few tools break the pattern with noun phrases (legal_research, legal_analysis, ordinance_radar), but they remain readable and semantically clear.
Tool Count5/5
10 tools is well-scoped for a legal research domain, each earning its place. The discover_tools/execute_tool meta-pair cleverly exposes 80+ specialized tools without bloating the primary surface.
Completeness4/5
Broad coverage across law search, text retrieval, annexes, decisions, multi-step research, analysis, and ordinance tracking, with the meta tools acting as an escape hatch. Minor gaps around things like saved/bookmarked workflows, but the surface is largely complete for the stated purpose.
Maintenance
ActivityActive
ResponsivenessWithin a week