A
licenseA
qualityD
maintenanceMCP server providing comprehensive Korean legal data access (laws, precedents, regulations, ordinances) with citation verification, temporal comparison, impact graphs, and legal research workflows.
10
8,867 npm
MIT
korean-law-mcp
by chrisryugj
Related Servers
Alternatives to korean-law-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Korean legal research, offering access to statutes, precedents, administrative rules, citation verification, and legal analysis through 10 tools.108,867 npmMIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Korean National Law Information. Enables searching and retrieving Korean laws, English-translated laws, administrative rules, court precedents, and constitutional decisions via 54 MCP tools.54-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides Korean legal information through 10 tools, including statutes, precedents, administrative rules, and citation verification with hallucination prevention, enabling legal research and analysis via AI assistants or CLI.108,867 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceThis MCP server provides Korean legal search tools for finding judgments, statutes, and sentencing statistics, and computing sentencing ranges.44MIT
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceSearch, compare, and analyze Korean national laws and public institution internal regulations via MCP.10081 npm2MIT
TDQS
A3.5/5.0
Scored across 10 tools
Disambiguation3/5
Core search/retrieval pairs are distinct: search_law vs get_law_text and search_decisions vs get_decision_text are clear. However, legal_analysis and legal_research are both broad multi-mode tools with overlapping subfunctions such as amendment_table vs amendment_track and impact_map vs dispute_prep/ordinance_compare. ordinance_radar also overlaps legal_research ordinance_compare, so tool selection requires careful reading of long descriptions.
Naming Consistency4/5
Most tools use readable snake_case verb_noun patterns: search_law, discover_tools, execute_tool, get_annexes, get_decision_text, get_law_text, search_decisions. The main deviations are noun-first names like legal_analysis, legal_research, and ordinance_radar, but casing and overall style remain consistent.
Tool Count5/5
Ten exposed tools are well within the appropriate range for a broad legal-research server. The discover_tools and execute_tool meta pair appropriately handles 80+ specialized tools without bloating the top-level surface.
Completeness5/5
The surface covers law search, law text retrieval, annexes/forms, decision search and retrieval, citation verification, historical/applicable law analysis, multi-step research, ordinance review, and meta access to specialized domains. No obvious lifecycle or workflow gap is apparent for the stated Korean-law domain.
Maintenance
ActivityActive
ResponsivenessWithin a week