Skip to main content
Glama
chrisjohntapp

suse-mcp

by chrisjohntapp
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to suse-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • allcanuse-mcp

      ra1nyxin
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A MCP server for Windows/Linux that provides 90+ tools enabling AI assistants to systematically manage local systems, including system probing, command execution, file editing, network diagnostics, and more.
      13
      MIT

    • linux-mcp-server

      szoran53
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for managing Ubuntu/Linux systems, enabling AI assistants to execute commands, manage services, files, logs, and packages via local or SSH connection.
      -

    • CodeAgent MCP

      davidlosasgonzalez
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Self-hosted MCP server that gives AI assistants a real Linux development environment: file editing, shell commands, tmux terminals, and browser screenshots, with bounded access through a project registry and write gates.
      39
      MIT

    • Kerneldev MCP

      josefbacik
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for intelligent Linux kernel configuration management and building. Enables AI assistants to generate, manage, and optimize kernel configurations and build kernels with comprehensive error detection.
      7
      GPL 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 22 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, and descriptions are thorough with examples. Minor overlap exists between run_system_health_check and individual diagnostic tools (e.g., check_updates_dry_run, analyze_storage), but the descriptions clarify when to use the comprehensive tool vs. the specific one.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., check_updates_dry_run, manage_orphans, query_file_ownership). Minor deviations like run_system_health_check (where 'check' is a noun) and check_updates_dry_run are still understandable and do not break the overall pattern.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 22 tools, the server feels heavy, but the broad domain of SUSE system management justifies a larger toolset. However, several tools are closely related (e.g., multiple manage_* tools, multiple analyze_* tools), which adds slight redundancy without necessarily adding value.

    Completeness2/5

    The toolset is strong on diagnostics, discovery, and analysis, but lacks critical lifecycle operations. There is no tool to apply system updates (only a dry-run check), and no tool to install official repository packages—only OBS packages can be installed. This creates significant gaps for real-world package management workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources