Skip to main content
Glama
setlist-mcp

setlist-mcp

by chrischall

setlist_search_venues

Read-onlyIdempotent

Search setlist.fm for venues by name, city, state, or country. Returns matching venues with their venue ID and URL for use with venue setlist lookups.

Instructions

Search setlist.fm for venues by name and/or location. Returns matching venues with their venue ID — use it with setlist_get_venue or setlist_get_venue_setlists. Results include a setlist.fm url; when you present this data, cite it as a clickable source link to setlist.fm (their API terms require followable attribution — no nofollow). If a result has no url, link to https://www.setlist.fm instead.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pNoResult page number (defaults to 1)
nameNoVenue name
viewNoResponse shape: "compact" (default) drops fields the response already carries elsewhere; "full" returns every field this server understands. compact strips image/avatar URLs from the response; "full" returns Setlist.fm's payload untouched. No field projection: this server has no verified record of which Setlist.fm fields matter, and inventing one would risk dropping a field a caller needs.
stateNoState name
cityIdNoCity's geoId
countryNoVenue's country
cityNameNoCity the venue is in
stateCodeNoState code

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.0.0
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
  2. Changed1 schema field changedv0.11.1
    • addedInput schema / properties / view
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Response shape: \"compact\" (default) drops fields the response already carries elsewhere; \"full\" returns every field this server understands. compact strips image/avatar URLs from the response; \"full\" returns Setlist.fm's payload untouched. No field projection: this server has no verified record of which Setlist.fm fields matter, and inventing one would risk dropping a field a caller needs.",
      +  "enum": [
      +    "compact",
      +    "full"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  3. First observedv0.4.0

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover the read-only/idempotent/open-world profile, and the description adds non-obvious context the annotations cannot: the setlist.fm API terms requiring followable attribution (no nofollow) and the fallback link to https://www.setlist.fm when a result lacks a url. It does not discuss pagination limits or result caps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loads purpose and return value, then the routing hint, then the attribution caveat. The attribution paragraph is longer than typical but is a genuine requirement, so it mostly earns its place; wording could be tightened.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a no-output-schema search tool with eight optional, fully documented params, the description covers purpose, return contents, and downstream usage. The main gap is not stating whether at least one filter (name/location) is expected or what happens with no arguments.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the schema itself carries detailed descriptions, including the rich 'view' enum explanation. The description adds nothing about the eight parameters (e.g., that they are freely combinable filters or that none is required), so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Names a specific verb and resource ('Search setlist.fm for venues') and states scope ('by name and/or location'), plus what is returned (venues with venue ID). It is clearly distinguishable from siblings like setlist_search_cities and setlist_search_artists by the resource, though it never explicitly contrasts with them.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives concrete downstream routing: the returned venue ID should be fed to setlist_get_venue or setlist_get_venue_setlists. It also states the attribution obligation when presenting results. It does not say when to prefer this over setlist_search_cities for location-based lookup, so it stops short of full alternative guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.