Skip to main content
Glama
setlist-mcp

setlist-mcp

by chrischall

setlist_search_artists

Read-onlyIdempotent

Search setlist.fm for artists by name or MusicBrainz ID; returns matching artists and MBIDs to use for artist details or setlist lookups.

Instructions

Search setlist.fm for artists by name or MusicBrainz ID. Returns matching artists with their MusicBrainz ID (mbid) — use that mbid with setlist_get_artist or setlist_get_artist_setlists. Results include a setlist.fm url; when you present this data, cite it as a clickable source link to setlist.fm (their API terms require followable attribution — no nofollow). If a result has no url, link to https://www.setlist.fm instead.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pNoResult page number (defaults to 1)
sortNoSort order (sortName = default, or relevance)
viewNoResponse shape: "compact" (default) drops fields the response already carries elsewhere; "full" returns every field this server understands. compact strips image/avatar URLs from the response; "full" returns Setlist.fm's payload untouched. No field projection: this server has no verified record of which Setlist.fm fields matter, and inventing one would risk dropping a field a caller needs.
artistMbidNoArtist's MusicBrainz ID (mbid)
artistNameNoArtist name to search for

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.0.0
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
  2. Changed1 schema field changedv0.11.1
    • addedInput schema / properties / view
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Response shape: \"compact\" (default) drops fields the response already carries elsewhere; \"full\" returns every field this server understands. compact strips image/avatar URLs from the response; \"full\" returns Setlist.fm's payload untouched. No field projection: this server has no verified record of which Setlist.fm fields matter, and inventing one would risk dropping a field a caller needs.",
      +  "enum": [
      +    "compact",
      +    "full"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  3. First observedv0.4.0

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover safety (readOnly, idempotent, openWorld), and the description adds genuinely non-structured behavior: the API-terms attribution obligation, the clickable-link requirement, and the fallback link when a result lacks a url. It stops short of noting pagination behavior or result limits, which the p/sort params imply but don't explain.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with purpose and downstream usage in the first two sentences; the attribution paragraph is mandatory output-handling instruction rather than filler, though it is slightly longer than needed to convey the rule.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema exists, but the description compensates by describing returned fields (mbid, url) and how to present them, which is the key thing an agent needs. Pagination semantics and result-shape expectations for the compact/full view are left entirely to the schema, but nothing critical is missing for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema fully documents p, sort, view, artistMbid and artistName. The description only restates the name/MusicBrainz-ID duality already in the schema and adds no syntax, format, or interaction guidance, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (search) and resource (artists) plus the two lookup modes (name or MusicBrainz ID). It is clearly distinguishable from setlist_get_artist and setlist_get_artist_setlists, which it names as downstream consumers of the returned mbid.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly tells the agent what to do with results (pass mbid to setlist_get_artist or setlist_get_artist_setlists), which routes it across siblings. It does not, however, say when to prefer artistMbid over artistName or when searching is needed versus a direct get, so the guidance is clear but not complete.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.