Skip to main content
Glama
chrischall

opentable-mcp

by chrischall

opentable_modify

Modify an existing OpenTable reservation to a new date, time, or party size. Requires a modify token from preview and confirmation to submit changes.

Instructions

Modify an existing OpenTable reservation in place. Requires the existing reservation's identity (restaurant_id + confirmation_number + security_token) plus a fresh modify_token from opentable_modify_preview — preview is mandatory because the new slot's cancellation policy / CC re-hold can differ from the original. Submits /dapi/booking/make-reservation with isModify: true + the existing confirmation_number + security_token; OpenTable preserves confirmation_number across modifies but may regenerate reservation_id and security_token. Returns the same shape as opentable_book plus was_modified: true so the agent can phrase the user confirmation accurately. For Listing-type restaurants there's no slot to lock — agents should check opentable_get_restaurant.bookable first. Without confirm:true this returns a dry-run and makes NO change to the reservation; re-run with confirm:true to submit the modification.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dateYesYYYY-MM-DD (the NEW date)
timeYesHH:MM (24h) — the NEW time
confirmNoMust be true to proceed. Without this, the tool returns a preview.
slot_hashYesslot_hash from opentable_find_slots for the NEW slot
party_sizeYes
modify_tokenNoREQUIRED. From opentable_modify_preview. No no-token path — the new slot's policy + CC re-hold can differ from the original.
experience_idNoOptional tamper-check signal. When set, must match the experienceId baked into modify_token.
restaurant_idYes
dining_area_idYes
security_tokenYes
reservation_tokenYesslot_availability_token from opentable_find_slots for the NEW slot
confirmation_numberYes
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. Discloses API endpoint, internal parameters, effect on confirmation_number and security_token, return shape including was_modified, and dry-run vs confirm behavior. Transparent about the need for modify_token due to differing cancellation policies.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Slightly long but every sentence adds value. Well-structured: starts with purpose, then requirements, then workflow details, then return, then special cases, then confirm behavior. Could be trimmed slightly but not wasteful.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 12 parameters (9 required) and no output schema, the description is thorough. Explains the modification process, preview dependency, confirmation handling, and a special case. Minor missing details about error handling or rate limits, but overall complete for agent usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Adds meaning beyond schema: explains purpose of modify_token, experience_id as optional tamper-check, reservation_token from opentable_find_slots, and confirms that confirm must be true to proceed. Covers key parameters despite 58% schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it modifies an existing OpenTable reservation, specifying the needed identity elements and the mandatory modify_token from preview. Distinguishes from sibling tools like opentable_book and opentable_modify_preview.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states when to use (modify existing reservation) and that preview is mandatory. Mentions special case for Listing-type restaurants. Does not explicitly state when not to use, but implied context is sufficient.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/chrischall/opentable-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server