Skip to main content
Glama
chrischall

opentable-mcp

by chrischall

opentable_list_reservations

Read-only

List your OpenTable reservations, defaulting to upcoming, or view past/all bookings. Each entry includes the security token required to cancel or modify a reservation.

Instructions

List the authenticated user's OpenTable reservations. Defaults to upcoming; pass scope="past" or scope="all" to broaden. Each entry includes the security_token needed to cancel or modify.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
viewNoResponse shape: "compact" (default) drops fields the response already carries elsewhere; "full" returns every field this server understands. compact strips image/avatar URLs from the response; "full" returns OpenTable's payload untouched. No field projection: this server has no verified record of which OpenTable fields matter, and inventing one would risk dropping a field a caller needs.
scopeNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.0.0
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
  2. Changed1 schema field changedv0.19.2
    • addedInput schema / properties / view
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Response shape: \"compact\" (default) drops fields the response already carries elsewhere; \"full\" returns every field this server understands. compact strips image/avatar URLs from the response; \"full\" returns OpenTable's payload untouched. No field projection: this server has no verified record of which OpenTable fields matter, and inventing one would risk dropping a field a caller needs.",
      +  "enum": [
      +    "compact",
      +    "full"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  3. First observedv0.14.3

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so safety is covered. The description adds genuinely useful behavioral context beyond them: the default scope resolution and the fact that each entry carries the security_token required to cancel or modify, which is a downstream workflow hint. It omits pagination, result caps, and any auth/permission nuance.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short sentences, no filler, front-loaded with the core action and followed by the default and the token handoff. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only list tool with annotations covering safety and no output schema, the description covers purpose, default scoping, and the key returned artifact (security_token). Missing only return-order/pagination details, which are minor for this shape.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is only 50%: 'view' is fully documented in the schema, but 'scope' carries no schema description at all. The description compensates for that gap by stating the default value and the meaningful enum alternatives, which is more than the schema alone conveys.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ("List the authenticated user's OpenTable reservations") with clear scope. It is unambiguously distinct from the action siblings (book, modify, cancel) and from the favorites/search tools, so an agent can route to it from the name plus first sentence alone.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It sets the default behavior ("Defaults to upcoming") and explains how to broaden with scope="past" or scope="all", which is exactly the decision an agent must make. It stops short of naming an alternative tool or an explicit when-not-to-use condition, but no sibling competes for this retrieval job.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.