Skip to main content
Glama
infinitecampus-mcp
by chrischall

ic_list_behavior

Read-only

List a student's behavior events and referrals; returns FeatureDisabled when the district's behavior module is turned off.

Instructions

List a student's behavior events / referrals. Returns FeatureDisabled if the district has the behavior module turned off (detected via displayOptions or a 404 backstop).

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
viewNoResponse shape: "compact" (default) drops fields the response already carries elsewhere; "full" returns every field this server understands. compact strips image/avatar URLs from the response; "full" returns Infinite Campus's payload untouched. No field projection: this server has no verified record of which Infinite Campus fields matter, and inventing one would risk dropping a field a caller needs.
sinceNoYYYY-MM-DD
untilNoYYYY-MM-DD
districtYes
studentIdYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed6 schema fields changedv3.2.1
    • addedInput schema / properties / since / description
      Added value: +"YYYY-MM-DD"
    • addedInput schema / properties / since / format
      Added value: +"date"
    • addedInput schema / properties / since / pattern
      Added value: +"^(?:(?:\\d\\d[2468][048]|\\d\\d[13579][26]|\\d\\d0[48]|[02468][048]00|[13579][26]00)-02-29|\\d{4}-(?:(?:0[13578]|1[02])-(?:0[1-9]|[12]\\d|3[01])|(?:0[469]|11)-(?:0[1-9]|[12]\\d|30)|(?:02)-(?:0[1-9]|1\\d|2[0-8])))$"
    • addedInput schema / properties / until / description
      Added value: +"YYYY-MM-DD"
    • addedInput schema / properties / until / format
      Added value: +"date"
    • addedInput schema / properties / until / pattern
      Added value: +"^(?:(?:\\d\\d[2468][048]|\\d\\d[13579][26]|\\d\\d0[48]|[02468][048]00|[13579][26]00)-02-29|\\d{4}-(?:(?:0[13578]|1[02])-(?:0[1-9]|[12]\\d|3[01])|(?:0[469]|11)-(?:0[1-9]|[12]\\d|30)|(?:02)-(?:0[1-9]|1\\d|2[0-8])))$"
  2. Changed1 schema field changedv3.0.0
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
  3. Addedv2.8.3

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover safety (readOnlyHint) and scope (openWorldHint), so the description adds real value by disclosing a non-obvious failure mode: a FeatureDisabled result detected via displayOptions or a 404 backstop. It omits pagination, rate limits, or result-volume behavior, which keeps it from a 5.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, purpose front-loaded and the error caveat second. Every clause carries information; nothing is padding.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only list tool with no output schema and readOnly/openWorld annotations, the description covers purpose and the key failure mode. It is thin on date-filter semantics and result shape, but those are partly served by the view parameter's schema description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 60% and the description explains none of the parameters: view, since, and until are documented only in the schema, and district/studentId have no schema descriptions at all. The single mention of "district" is contextual (module toggle), not a semantic explanation of the required parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The first sentence gives a specific verb and resource ("List a student's behavior events / referrals"), which cleanly separates it from sibling listers like ic_list_attendance or ic_list_fees. It does not explicitly name a sibling or contrast scope, so it stops short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives useful context about when the tool fails (module disabled at the district) but never states when to reach for this tool versus the other 18 ic_list_* siblings, nor when the since/until filters should be applied. Usage is only implied by the tool name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.