Skip to main content
Glama
chrischall

OurFamilyWizard MCP

by chrischall

gyg_get_tour_availability

Read-onlyIdempotent

Check tour booking availability to get bookable participant categories, addons, and available dates with participant ranges. Use when you only need to know when a tour can be booked.

Instructions

Get booking availability for a tour: bookable participant categories, addons, and the list of available dates (with participant ranges). Lighter than gyg_get_tour_options when you only need "when can I go". Image URLs are stripped by default; pass view:"full" to keep them.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
viewNoResponse shape: "compact" (default) drops fields the response already carries elsewhere; "full" returns every field this server understands. compact strips image URLs and keeps every other field; "full" returns GetYourGuide's whole record, image URLs included.
tourIdYesNumeric GetYourGuide tour ID (e.g. 23776).
languageNoContent language (e.g. en, de). Defaults to GYG_LANGUAGE when set.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv2.1.7
    • addedInput schema / properties / view
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Response shape: \"compact\" (default) drops fields the response already carries elsewhere; \"full\" returns every field this server understands. compact strips image URLs and keeps every other field; \"full\" returns GetYourGuide's whole record, image URLs included.",
      +  "enum": [
      +    "compact",
      +    "full"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  2. Changed1 schema field changedv2.0.0
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
  3. First observedv1.1.2

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, openWorld, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds useful response-shape behavior: image URLs are stripped by default and view:"full" restores them, which tells the agent about output volume/side effects. It stops short of describing date-list pagination or ordering, so it is not fully rich.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three tight sentences: purpose first, differentiation second, the view caveat last. No filler and the most decision-relevant information is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

There is no output schema, so the description correctly compensates by naming the returned payload (categories, addons, dated availability with participant ranges). Minor gaps remain around list size/pagination and whether dates are filtered by any implicit window, but the description is otherwise complete for a read-only lookup.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the view enum, tourId format, and language defaults are already fully documented in the schema; the description's note about image stripping only restates the view semantics. Baseline 3 is appropriate when the schema carries the parameter burden.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (Get) and resource (booking availability for a tour) and enumerates the payload contents: bookable participant categories, addons, and available dates with participant ranges. It also explicitly differentiates itself from the sibling gyg_get_tour_options, so an agent can route without opening either schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives an explicit selection rule: use this 'when you only need "when can I go"', and names gyg_get_tour_options as the heavier alternative for the fuller case. That is a clear when-to-use and when-to-prefer-the-sibling statement.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.