Skip to main content
Glama
chrischall

OurFamilyWizard MCP

by chrischall

gyg_get_location

Read-onlyIdempotent

Get details for a GetYourGuide location (city, POI, or region) by its numeric ID. Image URLs are stripped by default; pass view:"full" to keep them.

Instructions

Get details for a GetYourGuide location (city, POI, or region) by its numeric ID. Image URLs are stripped by default; pass view:"full" to keep them.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
viewNoResponse shape: "compact" (default) drops fields the response already carries elsewhere; "full" returns every field this server understands. compact strips image URLs and keeps every other field; "full" returns GetYourGuide's whole record, image URLs included.
languageNoContent language (e.g. en, de). Defaults to GYG_LANGUAGE when set.
locationIdYesNumeric location ID.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv2.1.7
    • addedInput schema / properties / view
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Response shape: \"compact\" (default) drops fields the response already carries elsewhere; \"full\" returns every field this server understands. compact strips image URLs and keeps every other field; \"full\" returns GetYourGuide's whole record, image URLs included.",
      +  "enum": [
      +    "compact",
      +    "full"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  2. Changed1 schema field changedv2.0.0
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
  3. Addedv1.1.4
  4. Removedv1.1.3
  5. First observedv1.1.2

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint and openWorldHint, so the safety profile is covered. The description restates the default image-stripping behavior, but that fact is already fully documented in the view parameter's schema description, and it adds nothing on auth requirements, rate limits, or behavior for invalid/nonexistent IDs.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tight sentences with the core operation front-loaded and the non-obvious default behavior trailing it. No filler, no restatement of the tool name or title.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only lookup with a fully documented 3-parameter schema and no output schema, the description covers the essentials. It could be stronger by naming a few top-level fields returned or noting behavior for an unknown ID, but nothing needed to call it correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so locationId, language and view are all documented in the schema, which sets the baseline at 3. The description's note about view:"full" is consistent with but not additive to the schema's own enum description, and language is not mentioned at all.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (get), a specific resource (GetYourGuide location), the resource subtypes it covers (city, POI, region), and the required lookup key (numeric ID). It is trivially distinguishable from siblings like gyg_get_tour and gyg_search_tours, which target different resources.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied — call it when you already have a location ID — but the description never states when to prefer this over gyg_search_tours or gyg_list_location_tours, nor what to do if you only have a name rather than an ID. It does clarify the view default, which is a conditional usage hint.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.