Clear Thought MCP Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| sequentialthinkingA | A detailed tool for dynamic and reflective problem-solving through thoughts. This tool helps analyze problems through a flexible thinking process that can adapt and evolve. Each thought can build on, question, or revise previous insights as understanding deepens. When to use this tool:
You should:
|
| mentalmodelC | A tool for applying structured mental models to problem-solving. Supports various mental models including:
Each model provides a systematic approach to breaking down and solving problems. |
| designpatternC | A tool for applying design patterns to software architecture and implementation. Supports various design patterns including:
Each pattern provides a structured approach to solving common design challenges. |
| programmingparadigmC | A tool for applying different programming paradigms to solve problems. Supports various programming paradigms including:
Each paradigm provides a different approach to structuring and executing code. |
| debuggingapproachC | A tool for applying systematic debugging approaches to solve technical issues. Supports various debugging methods including:
Each approach provides a structured method for identifying and resolving issues. |
| collaborativereasoningC | A detailed tool for simulating expert collaboration with diverse perspectives. This tool helps models tackle complex problems by coordinating multiple viewpoints. It provides a framework for structured collaborative reasoning and perspective integration. |
| decisionframeworkC | A detailed tool for structured decision analysis and rational choice. This tool helps models systematically evaluate options, criteria, and outcomes. It supports multiple decision frameworks, probability estimates, and value judgments. |
| metacognitivemonitoringC | A detailed tool for systematic self-monitoring of knowledge and reasoning quality. This tool helps models track knowledge boundaries, claim certainty, and reasoning biases. It provides a framework for metacognitive assessment across various domains and reasoning tasks. |
| scientificmethodB | A detailed tool for applying formal scientific reasoning to questions and problems. This tool guides models through the scientific method with structured hypothesis testing. It enforces explicit variable identification, prediction making, and evidence evaluation. |
| structuredargumentationC | A detailed tool for systematic dialectical reasoning and argument analysis. This tool helps analyze complex questions through formal argumentation structures. It facilitates the creation, critique, and synthesis of competing arguments. |
| visualreasoningC | A tool for visual thinking, problem-solving, and communication. This tool enables models to create, manipulate, and interpret diagrams, graphs, and other visual representations. It supports various visual elements and operations to facilitate insight generation and hypothesis testing. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 11 tools
The tools have overlapping purposes in problem-solving and reasoning, which could cause confusion. For example, 'collaborativereasoning', 'decisionframework', 'mentalmodel', and 'structuredargumentation' all involve structured analysis approaches, making it difficult for an agent to choose the most appropriate one. However, the detailed descriptions help differentiate them to some extent by emphasizing specific aspects like collaboration, decision-making, mental models, or argumentation.
The naming is mostly consistent with a clear pattern of using descriptive, compound words (e.g., 'collaborativereasoning', 'metacognitivemonitoring'). All tools follow a similar style without mixing conventions like camelCase or snake_case. The only minor deviation is 'sequentialthinking', which uses a single word instead of a compound, but it still fits the overall readable and predictable naming scheme.
With 11 tools, the count is reasonable for a server focused on reasoning and problem-solving methodologies. It covers a broad range of approaches without being overwhelming. However, it might be slightly heavy as some tools could be consolidated (e.g., overlapping reasoning tools), but overall, it's well-scoped for the domain of structured thinking and analysis.
The tool set provides comprehensive coverage of reasoning and problem-solving domains, including collaboration, debugging, decision-making, design, mental models, metacognition, programming paradigms, scientific methods, sequential thinking, argumentation, and visual reasoning. There are no obvious major gaps, as it spans from high-level frameworks to specific techniques. Minor gaps might exist in more niche areas, but agents can likely work around them given the breadth of tools available.