Skip to main content
Glama
chatkausik

Chess MCP Server

by chatkausik

Related Servers

Alternatives to Chess MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to play chess against users, manage games, make moves, and visualize boards with Stockfish AI opponent.
      8
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables playing chess games with legal move validation and AI opponent moves powered by the Stockfish engine. Supports multiple concurrent games and provides moves in UCI format.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables users to play interactive chess against the model inside ChatGPT, with the user taking white and the model black on a rendered board. Provides tools to start and end games, validate and apply both user and model moves, and retrieve the authoritative FEN, PGN, legal moves, and game history.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to play and analyze chess, validate moves, and view a live synchronized visual board in the browser through MCP tools.
      17 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables chess gameplay and interaction through MCP protocol. Allows users to play chess games, make moves, and manage chess sessions through natural language commands.
      2
      -

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The two tools target distinct aspects of a player: profile (general info) and stats (performance metrics). While both relate to a single player, they are clearly differentiated by their descriptions and purpose. There is minimal risk of confusion.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: get_chess_player_profile and get_chess_player_stats. The naming is uniform, predictable, and clearly indicates the resource and action.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels minimal, but it does cover two core capabilities. The count is borderline per the rubric—it's not trivial, but it's on the lower end of acceptable for a focused server.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface is severely limited for a chess domain. Obvious missing operations include fetching games, looking up leaderboards, or searching players. Agents would need many additional tools to perform common chess-related tasks, leaving significant gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues