Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to LegendKeeper MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants to Obsidian vaults via the Local REST API to search notes, retrieve content, and perform semantic searches. It features self-healing multi-URL connectivity and supports both stdio and HTTP transports for flexible deployment.
      125 npm
      13
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with Obsidian vaults for creating, reading, searching, and managing notes, daily notes, TODOs, session reports, and backlinks through both stdio and HTTP/SSE transports.
      10
      1,967 npm
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants and agents to Obsidian vaults through strongly typed tools and resources for reading, creating, searching, organizing, and analyzing notes, tasks, properties, tags, and knowledge-graph data. Supports secure remote access via stdio or Streamable HTTP/SSE with bearer authentication and path isolation.
      33
      1,967 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-capable coding agents to query a self-hosted, LLM-compiled Markdown knowledge base through a single ask tool that answers from whole wiki articles and returns citations back to the source pages. Supports both local stdio and remote streamable-HTTP transports, with no embeddings or vector store involved.
      -

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 31 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a distinct resource+action (resources, documents, map features, timeline events each have their own verbs). A few pairs could be confused at a glance — create_resource vs create_resources vs create_from_template, and get_resource vs read_document (metadata vs content) — but the descriptions clearly delineate them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Strong verb_noun snake_case pattern dominates (list_projects, create_resource, update_map_feature, delete_timeline_event). Minor deviations are 'search' (bare verb, no noun) and 'api_request' (noun_verb ordering), but overall the convention is predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    31 tools is on the heavy side, but the domain is genuinely broad — wiki resources, documents (pages/maps/timelines/boards), assets, tags, calendars and members. The count is defensible for that surface, though some document/map/timeline CRUD could arguably be folded together.

    Completeness5/5

    Near-complete lifecycle coverage: full CRUD plus trash/restore for resources, documents, map features and timeline events, plus search, tree browsing, tags, templates, facts, and asset upload. The api_request escape hatch explicitly covers remaining gaps (boards, calendars, invites, block edits).

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessNo issues