LegendKeeper MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to LegendKeeper MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to read and write a shared D&D campaign world, with tools for searching, retrieving, creating, updating, and linking pages, accessible via HTTP or stdio.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceConnects AI assistants to TTRPG campaign data for managing characters, sessions, locations, factions, items, quests, and more.4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceConnects AI assistants to Obsidian vaults via the Local REST API to search notes, retrieve content, and perform semantic searches. It features self-healing multi-URL connectivity and supports both stdio and HTTP transports for flexible deployment.283 npm13MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with Obsidian vaults for creating, reading, searching, and managing notes, daily notes, TODOs, session reports, and backlinks through both stdio and HTTP/SSE transports.103,500 npm4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceGives AI agents access to a persistent document workspace, letting them search, read, and update notes, guides, and project documentation across a full catalog of tools, prompts, and resources. It connects either to the hosted Cloud endpoint over Streamable HTTP with OAuth or API-key auth, or to a self-hosted instance through a stdio bridge.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceLets AI agents query, search and read wiki pages and raw transcripts of past coding sessions, so they can look up prior decisions and fixes before redoing work. It also exposes linting, sync, export and dashboard tools over stdio, with path-traversal guards and no SDK dependency.15MIT
TDQS
Scored across 31 tools
Most tools target a distinct resource+action (resources, documents, map features, timeline events each have their own verbs). A few pairs could be confused at a glance — create_resource vs create_resources vs create_from_template, and get_resource vs read_document (metadata vs content) — but the descriptions clearly delineate them.
Strong verb_noun snake_case pattern dominates (list_projects, create_resource, update_map_feature, delete_timeline_event). Minor deviations are 'search' (bare verb, no noun) and 'api_request' (noun_verb ordering), but overall the convention is predictable.
31 tools is on the heavy side, but the domain is genuinely broad — wiki resources, documents (pages/maps/timelines/boards), assets, tags, calendars and members. The count is defensible for that surface, though some document/map/timeline CRUD could arguably be folded together.
Near-complete lifecycle coverage: full CRUD plus trash/restore for resources, documents, map features and timeline events, plus search, tree browsing, tags, templates, facts, and asset upload. The api_request escape hatch explicitly covers remaining gaps (boards, calendars, invites, block edits).