Skip to main content
Glama
channico

MCP Knowledge Assistant

by channico

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Knowledge Assistant

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that provides document awareness for agents by parsing local files into structured profiles, blocks, chunks, and search results, enabling agents to understand and cite document content without dealing with raw file formats.
      5
      38 npm
      3
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for a content-first knowledge base, enabling AI agents to search (full-text, semantic, hybrid) and retrieve Markdown documents, list content, and find related docs.
      12 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that connects the Casio Plus knowledge base (playbooks, architecture, learning resources) to AI clients, offering read-only search and validation tools along with controlled feedback intake and review workflows.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server for a local-first supply chain knowledge base, enabling knowledge search with source evidence, internal system troubleshooting, vendor documentation fallback, vessel tracking, and work handoff preparation.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides tools for retrieving and processing documentation through vector search, enabling AI assistants to augment their responses with relevant documentation context.
      32 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    search and fetch have clearly distinct purposes: one finds documents by query, the other retrieves a specific document by ID. There is no overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools use simple, consistent single-verb names ('search' and 'fetch') that clearly indicate their actions. The pattern is uniform.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server is minimal but functionally complete for a simple search-and-retrieve pattern. It feels thin but is reasonable for a narrow purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    The two tools cover the core workflow of searching and retrieving documents. Minor gaps could include listing all documents or getting metadata, but the essential lifecycle is covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues