Skip to main content
Glama
chainfetch

ChainFETCH MCP Server

Official
by chainfetch
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to ChainFETCH MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-blockscout

      pipeworx-io
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables querying on-chain data (balances, transactions, token transfers, blocks) across 20+ EVM chains through natural language.
      3 npm
      MIT

    • Onchain MCP Server

      0xGval
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides tools for querying onchain data across 12+ blockchain networks, including token balances, transaction analysis, and smart contract security auditing. It enables users to interact with multiple EVM-compatible chains and perform deep contract evaluations through natural language interfaces.
      1
      -
    • CryptoQuant MCP Server by CryptoQuantOfficial

      CryptoQuant MCP Serverofficial

      CryptoQuantOfficial
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to access real-time on-chain crypto analytics, whale tracking, and market metrics through natural language queries. It provides access to over 245 endpoints for comprehensive data analysis of assets like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and stablecoins.
      7
      7 npm
      7
      MIT

    • Cryo MCP

      chainbound
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables natural language querying of blockchain data, including blocks, transactions, logs, and more, powered by Cryo and Reth, with optional micropayment integration via Payflow.
      7
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 26 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools are organized by resource type (address, block, NFT, smart contract, token, transaction) and action (get_info, get_summary, search), which provides clear distinctions. However, the three search methods (JSON, LLM, semantic) for each resource create some potential confusion about which search tool to use for a given query, as their purposes overlap significantly despite different interfaces.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names follow a highly consistent verb_noun pattern throughout: get_<resource>_info, get_<resource>_summary, search_<resource>_json, search_<resource>_llm, search_<resource>_semantic. The naming is systematic and predictable across all 26 tools, making it easy to understand the pattern and locate specific tools.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 26 tools, the count feels excessive for a blockchain data server. While the domain is broad, having three nearly identical search methods (JSON, LLM, semantic) for each of five resource types creates significant redundancy. A more streamlined approach with fewer overlapping tools would improve coherence without losing functionality.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides comprehensive coverage for blockchain data exploration. Each major resource type (address, block, smart contract, token, transaction) has both detailed information retrieval and AI-generated summaries, plus multiple search approaches. The inclusion of NFT instance information adds additional domain coverage, creating a complete surface for blockchain data analysis.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources