Skip to main content
Glama
ceciliomichael

Feedback Collector MCP

by ceciliomichael
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Feedback Collector MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP Feedback Collector

      zhaobu
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to collect interactive user feedback through a modern GUI that supports text input, multiple image uploads (via file selection or clipboard paste), allowing users to provide comprehensive feedback with screenshots and comments.
      1
      MIT

    • InputMCP

      swairshah
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables collecting contextual user input through a dedicated Electron window interface. Supports drawable image input and other input types, allowing MCP clients to request interactive user submissions.
      1
      11 npm
      MIT

    • mcp-feedback-ultra

      YangHang0210
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Interactive feedback server for AI-assisted development with Web UI and desktop app support, enabling user feedback collection after AI tasks.
      2
      MIT

    • ask-user-questions

      ZiuChen
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI models to ask users questions through a local web interface, supporting batch questions, multi-select, and free text for human-in-the-loop interactions.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap between tools. The single tool 'collect_feedback' has a clearly distinct purpose that cannot be mistaken for any other tool in this server.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool name 'collect_feedback' follows a clear verb_noun pattern. With only one tool, there is no inconsistency in naming conventions to evaluate, making it perfectly consistent.

    Tool Count2/5

    A single tool is too few for most server purposes, as it limits functionality and suggests a thin or incomplete implementation. While it might be appropriate for a very narrow scope, it generally feels insufficient for robust agent interaction.

    Completeness1/5

    The server appears to be for collecting feedback, but with only a collection tool, there are severe gaps: no tools for viewing, analyzing, updating, or managing feedback. This makes the surface severely incomplete for any meaningful feedback management workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessSyncing

    Resources