cassette_delete_clip

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description indicates a destructive operation ('Delete'), which is the core behavior. However, with no annotations, the description should clarify side effects (e.g., permanent removal, impact on associated data) but does not. Basic trait is clear, but deeper implications are missing.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no wasted words. However, it is too short and lacks structure, missing important details like behavioral notes or parameter guidance. It is concise but at the expense of completeness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, a single undocumented parameter, and no annotations, the description is severely incomplete. It does not cover what happens after deletion, error conditions, or whether the operation is reversible. The tool is a destructive action, so more context is necessary for safe usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has a single required parameter 'clipId' with no description and 0% schema coverage. The tool description does not explain what the clipId is, how to obtain it, or its format. Since schema coverage is low, the description should compensate, but it fails to provide any parameter semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Delete') and the resource ('a creator clip'). It aligns well with the tool name and distinguishes from siblings like cassette_delete_footage or cassette_delete_trend by specifying 'clip'. However, it could be more precise about what 'creator clip' entails.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., cassette_update_clip or cassette_get_clip). There is no mention of prerequisites, such as needing the clip ID or whether the clip must be in a certain state. The description assumes the agent already knows when deletion is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.