cassette_create_clip
Creates a new creator clip by providing a clip name. This tool adds a clip entry to the Cassette music platform.
Instructions
Create a new creator clip.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes |
Creates a new creator clip by providing a clip name. This tool adds a clip entry to the Cassette music platform.
Create a new creator clip.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure, but it only states the basic action. It does not mention any side effects, authorization requirements, or what happens upon creation, leaving the agent uninformed.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is one short sentence, which is concise, but it is too minimal to be considered well-structured. Every word earns its place, but the lack of detail makes it merely adequate.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (1 required param, no output schema), the description is incomplete. It does not clarify what a 'creator clip' is, how it relates to sibling tools, or any prerequisites, leaving significant gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has one required parameter 'name' with no description, and the tool description does not add any meaning to it. With 0% schema description coverage, the description should compensate but fails to explain what 'name' represents or any constraints.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action 'create' and the resource 'clip', making the primary purpose understandable. However, it does not distinguish from sibling tools like 'cassette_create_track' or 'cassette_create_trend', which could cause confusion.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description fails to explain scenarios where creating a clip is appropriate compared to other create tools or update/delete operations.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/cassette-music-management-tool/cassette-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server