Ploi.io MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Ploi.io MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceIntegrates Ploi.io API functionality into AI assistants for managing servers, sites, and databases through natural language. It enables features like one-command deployments, project linking, server log retrieval, and database backup management.465 npm3MIT
- AlicenseDqualityFmaintenanceProvides programmatic and CLI tools for managing Coolify deployments, allowing users to control applications, services, databases, and infrastructure through natural language or command line.1019 npm7Good Luck With That Public
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceA local stdio MCP server that provides 69 tools for Cloudflare REST API v4, including DNS, Zones, Workers, KV, R2, D1, Pages, Queues, Tunnels, SSL, WAF, Email Routing, Logpush and Workers AI, authenticated by a single API token.6936 npm3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage cloud infrastructure through natural language by providing a unified interface to the Dokploy platform. Supports Docker containers, applications, databases, domains, monitoring, and deployment operations through conversational commands.10 npm1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables managing Pterodactyl Game Panel servers via Client and Application APIs, including power actions, files, databases, backups, schedules, and administrative operations.115 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to fully manage Laravel Forge servers, sites, databases, workers, daemons, SSL certificates, and deployments.3980 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 32 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action. Categories like servers, sites, databases, and containers have clear boundaries with no overlapping operations.
All tools follow a consistent 'ploi_verb_noun' pattern (e.g., ploi_list_servers, ploi_create_site), making it easy to infer function from name.
With 32 tools, the set is on the high side but still reasonable for managing multiple server aspects (servers, sites, databases, containers, providers, backups, IPs). A slight reduction could improve focus.
The tool surface covers servers, sites, and containers well, but databases lack create/delete operations and backups only list configurations. Notable gaps for a server management tool.