Skip to main content
Glama
captenmasin

Ploi.io MCP Server

by captenmasin
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Ploi.io MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Ploi MCP Server

      sudanese
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Integrates Ploi.io API functionality into AI assistants for managing servers, sites, and databases through natural language. It enables features like one-command deployments, project linking, server log retrieval, and database backup management.
      46
      13 npm
      3
      MIT

    • Dokploy MCP Server

      MCP-Mirror
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage cloud infrastructure through natural language by providing a unified interface to the Dokploy platform. Supports Docker containers, applications, databases, domains, monitoring, and deployment operations through conversational commands.
      27 npm
      1
      -

    • Coolify MCP Server

      kof70
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables control and management of Coolify self-hosted PaaS instances, allowing you to deploy applications, manage databases, monitor servers, and execute operations directly from AI assistants.
      89
      18 npm
      29
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 32 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action. Categories like servers, sites, databases, and containers have clear boundaries with no overlapping operations.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent 'ploi_verb_noun' pattern (e.g., ploi_list_servers, ploi_create_site), making it easy to infer function from name.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 32 tools, the set is on the high side but still reasonable for managing multiple server aspects (servers, sites, databases, containers, providers, backups, IPs). A slight reduction could improve focus.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool surface covers servers, sites, and containers well, but databases lack create/delete operations and backups only list configurations. Notable gaps for a server management tool.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources