Campertunity MCP Server
OfficialCampertunity AIツール
世界中のキャンプ場を検索し、空き状況を確認し、予約するためのAIツールです。
エージェントスキルファイルと、AIを活用したキャンプ場検索のためのMCPサーバーが含まれています。
エージェントスキルファイル
このパッケージには、OpenClaw、Claude Code、Codex、およびSKILL.md形式をサポートするその他のエージェントプラットフォームと互換性のあるスキルファイルが含まれています。
スキルのインストール:
# OpenClaw
openclaw skills install campertunity
# Claude Code / other platforms
# Copy skills/campertunity/SKILL.md to your workspace skills directoryRelated MCP server: Currents
MCPサーバー
クイックスタート
{
"mcpServers": {
"campertunity": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "campertunity-ai-tools@latest"]
}
}
}APIキー(オプション)
APIキーは不要です。より高いレート制限が必要な場合は、campertunity.com/mcpからキーを取得してください:
{
"mcpServers": {
"campertunity": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "campertunity-ai-tools@latest"],
"env": {
"CAMPERTUNITY_API_KEY": "your_api_key_here"
}
}
}
}利用可能なツール
listing-search
フィルターと位置情報に基づいた検索を使用してキャンプ場を検索します。
パラメータ | 型 | 説明 |
| number | 返される結果数 (デフォルト: 50, 最大: 1000) |
| string | 前回のレスポンスからのページネーションカーソル |
| string | 空き状況の開始日 (YYYY-MM-DD) |
| string | 空き状況の終了日 (YYYY-MM-DD) |
| number | 大人の人数 (デフォルト: 1) |
| number | 子供の人数 (デフォルト: 0) |
| number | 中心点の緯度 |
| number | 中心点の経度 |
| number | 検索半径 (km) (デフォルト: 20) |
| string | 地域/州 (緯度/経度がない場合はジオコーディングされます) |
| string | 市区町村 (緯度/経度がない場合はジオコーディングされます) |
| string | 国 (緯度/経度がない場合はジオコーディングされます) |
| string | 国コード (例: "US", "CA") |
| string[] | フィルタリングするタグ (下記参照) |
| string | 自然言語による説明 |
listing-details
特定のリスティングに関する詳細情報を取得します。
パラメータ | 型 | 説明 |
| string | リスティングのID |
listing-availability
特定の日付のキャンプサイトの空き状況を確認します。
パラメータ | 型 | 説明 |
| string | リスティングのID |
| string[] | オプションの特定のサイトID |
| string | 開始日 (YYYY-MM-DD) |
| string | 終了日 (YYYY-MM-DD) |
listing-book
キャンプ場の予約URLを取得します。
パラメータ | 型 | 説明 |
| string | リスティングのID |
| string | 開始日 (YYYY-MM-DD) |
| string | 終了日 (YYYY-MM-DD) |
| number | 大人の人数 (デフォルト: 1) |
| number | 子供の人数 (デフォルト: 0) |
フィルタータグ
サイトタイプ: tent, rv, lodging, glamping, cabin
アクセス: driveIn, walkIn, equestrian, boat
アクティビティ: biking, boating, fishing, hiking, horsebackRiding, paddling, windSports, surfing, swimming, whitewaterPaddling, wildlifeWatching
設備: picnicTable, fires, toilets, outhouse, potableWater, petFriendly, rvHookup, rvSanitation, trash, showers, wifi, handicap
地形: beach, cave, desert, forest, hotSpring, lake, river, swimmingHole, waterfall, creek
データに関する注意
データは複数のソースから収集され、AIによって強化されています。データの再配布、キャッシュ、または変更は行わないでください。常にサーバーを通じてリアルタイムのデータを使用してください。
詳細については、campertunity.comをご覧ください。
Available Tools
4 toolsplace-availabilityD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| placeId | Yes | The id of the place to check availability for. | |
| siteIds | No | The ids of the sites to check availability for. | |
| startDate | Yes | The start date to check availability for. Format: YYYY-MM-DD | |
| endDate | Yes | The end date to check availability for. Format: YYYY-MM-DD |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
place-bookD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| placeId | Yes | The id of the place to book. | |
| startDate | No | The start date of the booking. Format: YYYY-MM-DD | |
| endDate | No | The end date of the booking. Format: YYYY-MM-DD | |
| adults | No | Number of adults. Default is 1. | |
| children | No | Number of children. Default is 0. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
place-detailsD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| placeId | Yes | The id of the place to get details for. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
place-searchD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | Number of places to return. Default is 50, max is 1000. | |
| startDate | No | Start date for availability search. Format: YYYY-MM-DD | |
| endDate | No | End date for availability search. Format: YYYY-MM-DD | |
| adults | No | Number of adults. Default is 1. | |
| children | No | Number of children. Default is 0. | |
| latitude | No | Latitude to filter by. | |
| longitude | No | Longitude to filter by. | |
| radius | No | Radius to filter by (in km). | |
| filters | No | Filter out places that have specific tags. | |
| campgroundDescription | No | Describe the campground you are looking for. Note: not the location, but something about the campground like "has a pool" or "near a lake" or "has a playground" |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
4 tool updates
- First observed
place-availability - First observed
place-book - First observed
place-details - First observed
place-search
TDQS
The tools have distinct purposes based on their names: search for finding places, details for getting information, availability for checking status, and book for making reservations. While the lack of descriptions introduces some ambiguity about exact boundaries, the core actions (search, get, check, reserve) are clearly differentiated.
All tools follow a perfect 'place-verb' pattern with hyphenated naming (place-search, place-details, place-availability, place-book). This consistency makes the tool set predictable and easy to understand at a glance.
With 4 tools, this server is well-scoped for a camping/place booking domain. Each tool covers a fundamental operation (search, view details, check availability, book), and there are no extraneous tools—each earns its place in the workflow.
The tool set covers the essential CRUD-like operations for a booking system: search (discover), details (read), availability (check), and book (create). A minor gap is the lack of update/cancel or delete operations for bookings, but agents can still complete core workflows with the provided tools.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
MCP server for Environment & Nature
Related MCP Servers
- MIT
- Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceBrowserStack's Official MCP Server512,516150AGPL 3.0
- -
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/campertunity/mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server