Campertunity MCP Server
OfficialHerramientas de IA de Campertunity
Herramientas de IA para buscar campings, comprobar disponibilidad y reservar parcelas en todo el mundo.
Incluye archivos de habilidades de agente y un servidor MCP para el descubrimiento de campings mediante IA.
Archivos de habilidades de agente
Este paquete incluye archivos de habilidades compatibles con OpenClaw, Claude Code, Codex y otras plataformas de agentes que admiten el formato SKILL.md.
Instalar la habilidad:
# OpenClaw
openclaw skills install campertunity
# Claude Code / other platforms
# Copy skills/campertunity/SKILL.md to your workspace skills directoryRelated MCP server: Currents
Servidor MCP
Inicio rápido
{
"mcpServers": {
"campertunity": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "campertunity-ai-tools@latest"]
}
}
}Clave de API (opcional)
No se requiere ninguna clave de API. Para obtener límites de tasa más altos, obtenga una clave en campertunity.com/mcp:
{
"mcpServers": {
"campertunity": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "campertunity-ai-tools@latest"],
"env": {
"CAMPERTUNITY_API_KEY": "your_api_key_here"
}
}
}
}Herramientas disponibles
listing-search
Busque campings con filtros y búsqueda basada en la ubicación.
Parámetro | Tipo | Descripción |
| number | Resultados a devolver (predeterminado: 50, máx: 1000) |
| string | Cursor de paginación de la respuesta anterior |
| string | Fecha de inicio de disponibilidad (AAAA-MM-DD) |
| string | Fecha de fin de disponibilidad (AAAA-MM-DD) |
| number | Número de adultos (predeterminado: 1) |
| number | Número de niños (predeterminado: 0) |
| number | Latitud del punto central |
| number | Longitud del punto central |
| number | Radio de búsqueda en km (predeterminado: 20) |
| string | Región/estado (geocodificado si no hay lat/lng) |
| string | Ciudad (geocodificada si no hay lat/lng) |
| string | País (geocodificado si no hay lat/lng) |
| string | Código de país, p. ej. "US", "CA" |
| string[] | Etiquetas para filtrar (ver abajo) |
| string | Descripción en lenguaje natural |
listing-details
Obtenga información detallada sobre un listado específico.
Parámetro | Tipo | Descripción |
| string | ID del listado |
listing-availability
Compruebe la disponibilidad de parcelas para fechas específicas.
Parámetro | Tipo | Descripción |
| string | ID del listado |
| string[] | IDs de parcelas específicas opcionales |
| string | Fecha de inicio (AAAA-MM-DD) |
| string | Fecha de fin (AAAA-MM-DD) |
listing-book
Obtenga una URL de reserva para un camping.
Parámetro | Tipo | Descripción |
| string | ID del listado |
| string | Fecha de inicio (AAAA-MM-DD) |
| string | Fecha de fin (AAAA-MM-DD) |
| number | Número de adultos (predeterminado: 1) |
| number | Número de niños (predeterminado: 0) |
Etiquetas de filtro
Tipos de sitio: tent, rv, lodging, glamping, cabin
Acceso: driveIn, walkIn, equestrian, boat
Actividades: biking, boating, fishing, hiking, horsebackRiding, paddling, windSports, surfing, swimming, whitewaterPaddling, wildlifeWatching
Comodidades: picnicTable, fires, toilets, outhouse, potableWater, petFriendly, rvHookup, rvSanitation, trash, showers, wifi, handicap
Terreno: beach, cave, desert, forest, hotSpring, lake, river, swimmingHole, waterfall, creek
Aviso sobre los datos
Los datos se recopilan de múltiples fuentes y se mejoran con IA. No redistribuya, almacene en caché ni modifique los datos. Utilice siempre datos en tiempo real a través del servidor.
Para obtener más información, visite campertunity.com.
Available Tools
4 toolsplace-availabilityD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| placeId | Yes | The id of the place to check availability for. | |
| siteIds | No | The ids of the sites to check availability for. | |
| startDate | Yes | The start date to check availability for. Format: YYYY-MM-DD | |
| endDate | Yes | The end date to check availability for. Format: YYYY-MM-DD |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
place-bookD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| placeId | Yes | The id of the place to book. | |
| startDate | No | The start date of the booking. Format: YYYY-MM-DD | |
| endDate | No | The end date of the booking. Format: YYYY-MM-DD | |
| adults | No | Number of adults. Default is 1. | |
| children | No | Number of children. Default is 0. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
place-detailsD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| placeId | Yes | The id of the place to get details for. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
place-searchD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | Number of places to return. Default is 50, max is 1000. | |
| startDate | No | Start date for availability search. Format: YYYY-MM-DD | |
| endDate | No | End date for availability search. Format: YYYY-MM-DD | |
| adults | No | Number of adults. Default is 1. | |
| children | No | Number of children. Default is 0. | |
| latitude | No | Latitude to filter by. | |
| longitude | No | Longitude to filter by. | |
| radius | No | Radius to filter by (in km). | |
| filters | No | Filter out places that have specific tags. | |
| campgroundDescription | No | Describe the campground you are looking for. Note: not the location, but something about the campground like "has a pool" or "near a lake" or "has a playground" |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
4 tool updates
- First observed
place-availability - First observed
place-book - First observed
place-details - First observed
place-search
TDQS
The tools have distinct purposes based on their names: search for finding places, details for getting information, availability for checking status, and book for making reservations. While the lack of descriptions introduces some ambiguity about exact boundaries, the core actions (search, get, check, reserve) are clearly differentiated.
All tools follow a perfect 'place-verb' pattern with hyphenated naming (place-search, place-details, place-availability, place-book). This consistency makes the tool set predictable and easy to understand at a glance.
With 4 tools, this server is well-scoped for a camping/place booking domain. Each tool covers a fundamental operation (search, view details, check availability, book), and there are no extraneous tools—each earns its place in the workflow.
The tool set covers the essential CRUD-like operations for a booking system: search (discover), details (read), availability (check), and book (create). A minor gap is the lack of update/cancel or delete operations for bookings, but agents can still complete core workflows with the provided tools.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
MCP server for Environment & Nature
Description of my MCP server
Related MCP Servers
- MIT
- Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceBrowserStack's Official MCP Server512,516150AGPL 3.0
- -
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/campertunity/mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server