post-crm-v3-objects-quotes-batch-update_update

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It says 'update' and provides an example, but does not disclose response behavior, error handling, idempotency, or side effects. The example shows request shape but not what happens after the update.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two short sentences plus an example, with the purpose stated up front. No filler or repetition; every sentence contributes meaning.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and no annotations, the description is minimal. It fails to mention what the response contains, potential errors, batch size limits, or whether the update is partial. The example helps but does not fill these gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, giving a baseline of 3. The description adds a concrete example ({body: {inputs: [...]}}) that clarifies the nested structure, and mentions 'unique property values' which aligns with the idProperty schema documentation, adding practical value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Update a batch of quotes by internal ID, or unique property values', identifying a specific verb (update), resource (quotes), and batch scope. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like batch-read, batch-create, and batch-archive.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use when updating multiple existing quotes, but does not explicitly contrast with batch-upsert or single-update alternatives. The phrase 'REQUIRES body parameter' is a request format requirement, not guidance on when to choose this tool over others.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.