delete-crm-v3-objects-objtype-objid-associations-var-var-var_var

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states 'Remove' which implies mutation, but does not disclose whether the deletion is reversible, what happens if the association does not exist, permission requirements, or any side effects on related data.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, direct sentence with no extraneous words. It immediately conveys the operation and is optimally concise for such a simple endpoint.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

This mutation tool has no annotations, no output schema, and only a minimal description. It fails to mention expected responses, error behavior, or any special conditions, so the information provided is not sufficient for an agent to invoke it with full confidence.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema covers all five parameters, and the schema descriptions (e.g., 'Path parameter objectId') are present, giving high coverage. Per the rubric baseline for high coverage is 3; however, the description adds no additional semantic meaning beyond the schema fields.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Remove an association between two objects' clearly states the verb and resource. It is specific enough to understand the core action, though it does not explicitly distinguish from similar sibling tools like the v4 delete-association endpoint; that differentiation is left to the tool name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention any prerequisites, scenarios, or exclusions, leaving the agent without context for choosing this over the v4 association delete or other related operations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.