create_instrument_domain

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description only states the creation action and admin restriction. It does not disclose side effects, required permissions beyond admin, whether changes are reversible, or what happens on success/failure. No annotations exist to compensate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence that contains the essential information: action and restriction. No redundant words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having an output schema and 6 parameters, the description omits context like return value behavior, example usage, or explanation of domain/dimension concept. It is insufficient for a complex creation tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the description does not need to add much. However, it adds no extra meaning; it does not explain any parameters or their roles beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Buat dimensi/domain baru') and the resource ('pada sebuah instrumen'), and specifies admin-only access. It unambiguously indicates creation, distinguishing from sibling tools like update or delete.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., update_instrument_domain or list_instrument_domains). There is no mention of prerequisites, conditions, or scenarios where this tool is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.