Skip to main content
Glama
content-validity-index-mcp

content-validity-index-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to content-validity-index-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to create and read structured research records—projects, questions, specifications, implementations, executions, artifacts, evidence, evaluations, comparisons, analyses, and reports—through MCP while keeping scientific judgments and approvals human-controlled.
      37
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to discover, search, retrieve, and read supporting files from a centrally published, versioned skill registry through four read-only MCP tools.
      21 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables querying and browsing SNOMED CT medical terminology concepts, including search, details, and hierarchy navigation via MCP tools.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables controlled, read-only access to research information in OSIRIS through typed, auditable MCP tools for searching activities, people, experts, and organizational metadata.
      12
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for retrieving clinical standard content from the CDISC Library, supporting controlled terminology, ADaM, SDTM, CDASH, SEND metadata, and search.
      31
      7
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: domain CRUD, list instruments/domains/items/assignments/ratings, calculate CVI, get instrument, and whoami. No overlapping functionality.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names consistently follow a verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., create_instrument_domain, list_instruments). The only exception is 'whoami', which is a widely accepted idiom.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 11 tools covering instruments, domains, items, assignments, ratings, user info, and CVI calculation, the count is well-scoped for the domain without being overwhelming or insufficient.

    Completeness3/5

    The set lacks CRUD for instruments and items (only get and list are provided). This creates notable gaps, as users cannot create or update these core entities via the MCP server.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues