vyos_save
Save the current running configuration to disk on a VyOS router, ensuring persistent changes after reboot.
Instructions
Save running VyOS configuration to disk.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Save the current running configuration to disk on a VyOS router, ensuring persistent changes after reboot.
Save running VyOS configuration to disk.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. The description implies a non-destructive save operation but does not detail side effects (e.g., overwriting disk config) or required permissions. Adequate but not rich.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no wasted words. Perfectly concise for a simple operation.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description is complete enough for a parameterless tool with no output schema. It could mention saving to startup-config or immediate impact, but the core functionality is clear.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist in the schema, so the description adds no parameter-specific meaning. Baseline for 0 parameters is 4, and the description is sufficient given the tool's simplicity.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Save') and the resource ('running VyOS configuration to disk'), establishing a distinct purpose from sibling tools like vyos_configure or vyos_load.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., vyos_configure, vyos_load). No context on prerequisites or situations where saving is appropriate.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/cacack/mcp-server-vyos'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server