Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to vyos-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for comprehensive OPNsense firewall management, enabling AI assistants to manage firewall rules, NAT, VLANs, and network diagnostics, plus execute SSH/CLI commands. Supports safety modes like read-only and dry-run for safe operation.
      154 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server for network device management via SSH/Telnet. Supports multiple vendors such as Cisco IOS and BDCOM, enabling AI assistants to execute commands and manage routers, switches, and firewalls.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A secure MCP server for managing OPNsense firewalls through AI assistants. Provides 81 tools across system, firewall, network, DNS, DHCP, VPN, HAProxy, services, diagnostics, and security domains.
      81
      211 PyPI
      20
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables managing VyOS appliances through their HTTP API, providing tools for configuration, operational commands, and interactive troubleshooting.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 28 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes (e.g., vyos_ping vs vyos_traceroute, vyos_retrieve vs vyos_return_values). A few pairs could be confused, such as vyos_show vs vyos_retrieve, but descriptions clarify the distinction. vyos_config_diff is clearly differentiated from a running-config comparison.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Almost all tools use a consistent vyos_ prefix with a verb or noun pattern. Minor deviations like vyos_info, vyos_return_values, and vyos_config_history break the strict verb_noun pattern but remain readable and predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 28 tools, the set is heavy for a router management server. While each tool covers a distinct operation, the volume increases cognitive load and the risk of misselection.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers essential config lifecycle (retrieve, validate, configure, confirm, save) and many operational commands. Minor gaps exist: no direct rollback tool (though noted as unavailable) and no explicit interface configuration tool, but agents can work around these.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessSlow