Skip to main content
Glama

TradFi perpetuals: stock, index and commodity perps on Binance

get_tradfi_board
Read-only

Retrieve Binance TradFi perpetual board data—funding rates, open interest, liquidations, venue listings and session state—to answer questions about stock, commodity or index perps.

Instructions

Call this when the user asks about stock perpetuals (TSLA, NVDA, AAPL, gold, S&P 500...), tokenized-equity perps, TradFi perp funding rates, open interest, liquidations, which exchanges list a stock perp, or whether the equity session is open. Returns Binance's TradFi perpetual board: per contract mark, index, basis, funding, 24h change and volume, open interest, 24h recorded liquidations, other venues listing the same underlying, and the trading-session state per market. Filter by market (EQUITY, HK_EQUITY, KR_EQUITY, CN_EQUITY, COMMODITY, INDEX, PREMARKET) or one symbol. Without symbol, the first 30 contracts by open interest; pass symbol, or limit (up to 150) for more.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoOptional. Contracts without symbol, largest open interest first (default 30).
marketNoMarket filter: EQUITY | HK_EQUITY | KR_EQUITY | CN_EQUITY | COMMODITY | INDEX | PREMARKET
symbolNoOne Binance TradFi symbol, e.g. TSLAUSDT

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.1.0
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
  2. Changed1 schema field changedv0.36.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / limit
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Optional. Contracts without symbol, largest open interest first (default 30).",
      +  "maximum": 150,
      +  "minimum": 1,
      +  "type": "integer"
      +}
  3. Addedv0.27.2

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and openWorldHint, so safety is covered. The description adds real behavioral context: the full return payload, the default paging rule (first 30 by open interest), and that limit can go to 150. It doesn't mention rate limits or data freshness/latency, which would round it out.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with the trigger condition, then the return payload, then the parameter rules — a logical order. The parenthetical symbol examples are slightly dense but all serve disambiguation; only minor trimming is possible.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema exists, but the description enumerates the returned fields, the market filter options, the default and maximum result counts, and the session-state information. An agent has everything needed to call it correctly and interpret the result shape.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description earns above baseline by explaining the interaction between the params: 'Without symbol, the first 30 contracts by open interest; pass symbol, or limit (up to 150) for more,' which is behavioral meaning the schema alone doesn't convey.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: 'Returns Binance's TradFi perpetual board' with an enumerated field list (mark, index, basis, funding, OI, liquidations, session state). This clearly distinguishes it from siblings like get_tokenized_stocks, get_open_interest, or get_market_indices.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Opens with an explicit trigger list ('Call this when the user asks about stock perpetuals, tokenized-equity perps, funding rates, OI, liquidations, which exchanges list a stock perp, or whether the equity session is open'). It doesn't explicitly exclude or route to the nearest siblings (get_tokenized_stocks, get_open_interest), which keeps it from a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.