Skip to main content
Glama

Quantum-exposed Bitcoin (daily first-party measurement)

get_quantum_exposure
Read-only

Measure how much Bitcoin is exposed to quantum attack risk. Returns daily quantum-vulnerable BTC supply, P2PK and Satoshi-era exposure, with verifiable provenance hashes.

Instructions

Call this when the user asks how much Bitcoin is vulnerable to a quantum computer, about quantum-exposed supply, P2PK coins, or Satoshi-era exposure. Returns the latest daily measurement from ByKaranteli's own Bitcoin Core node: exposed BTC and its share of held value and UTXO count, composition by script family, dormancy cohorts, the dormant-P2PK watch set, and provenance hashes (base_height, base_hash, txoutset_hash) so any figure can be re-verified against any node.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.1.0
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
  2. Addedv0.9.0

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only declare readOnlyHint and openWorldHint; the description adds substantive context: this is a daily measurement from ByKaranteli's own Bitcoin Core node, and it details returned fields including exposed BTC share, script-family composition, dormancy cohorts, dormant-P2PK watch set, and provenance hashes. This gives the agent a clear sense of data provenance and verifiability.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences: the first front-loads the call conditions, the second efficiently enumerates the payload. No filler, and every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Without an output schema, the description carries the full burden of explaining return values and does so thoroughly, covering the main metrics, composition, cohorts, watch set, and provenance hashes. An agent has enough information to call it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters and an empty schema, so there are no parameter semantics to explain; baseline 4 applies. The description does not need to compensate for missing schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb-resource pair (get quantum exposure) and a precise domain: daily first-party measurement of Bitcoin vulnerable to quantum computing. No sibling tool covers quantum exposure, so an agent can distinguish it immediately.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly lists the user questions that should trigger the tool: how much Bitcoin is vulnerable to a quantum computer, quantum-exposed supply, P2PK coins, and Satoshi-era exposure. It does not name alternatives or exclusions, but none of the sibling tools overlap with this domain.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.