Search OlaOla Product Content

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description must bear full burden. It states results are text context only, but does not disclose authentication requirements, rate limits, response format, or whether the search is read-only. This leaves significant behavioral gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two concise sentences with no wasted words, front-loading purpose and then providing usage hints. It earns its sentences.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations, no output schema, and 0% schema description coverage, the description should be more complete. It lacks details on response format, search behavior (e.g., fuzzy matching), and does not fully explain all parameters. Incomplete for agent decision-making.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description adds some meaning by suggesting short Czech queries, but does not explain the maxHints parameter or the distinction between query and queries. Important parameter semantics remain undocumented.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool searches public OlaOla WP product_content entries for supplemental text context, distinguishes it from product search tools by noting results are text context only and not directly cartable, and provides example Czech queries.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description advises using short Czech queries and explains the type of input expected, guiding the agent on appropriate usage. It lacks explicit when-not-to-use or alternatives, but the context from sibling tools helps differentiate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.