Get OlaOla Order Detail

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, and the description mentions 'Log into OlaOla' which suggests an authentication side-effect not explained. It does not clarify if the operation is read-only or has other side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short but includes unnecessary detail ('Log into OlaOla with local env credentials') that adds length without clarity. The core purpose is efficient, but could be trimmed.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 1 parameter and no output schema, the description lacks details on response structure, error handling, or prerequisites. It feels incomplete for a single-order fetch tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The parameter 'orderNumber' has no description in schema or tool description. With 0% schema coverage, the description does not compensate by explaining format, source, or constraints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'fetch one order detail', specifying the verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings like 'olaola_get_order_history' which suggests multiple records.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use for fetching a single order, but does not explicitly state when to use versus alternatives like 'get_order_history' or any prerequisites beyond implicit login.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.