seed_delete_views

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the burden of behavioral disclosure. It does not mention whether deletions are permanent, whether missing names cause errors, whether the operation is idempotent, or any side effects. The word 'Delete' implies mutation but does not elaborate on consequences.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence that is immediately clear and front-loaded with the action. There is no wasted verbiage or redundant restatement of the tool name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple 1-parameter delete operation with no output schema, the description is minimally adequate. However, it omits any mention of batch behavior (though implied by array schema) and does not address error cases or return values. Given the tool's low complexity, this is acceptable but not thorough.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% (the viewNames property has its own description). The tool description adds no additional semantic nuance beyond the schema, such as handling of duplicates or invalid names, so it earns the baseline score for adequate schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action ('Delete'), a clear resource ('Seed views'), and a scoping detail ('by name'). This clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like seed_create_view, seed_update_view, and seed_list_views.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites or exclusions. It is a bare statement of function with no contextual usage advice.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.