seed_create_org

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It does disclose a permission requirement, which is useful context for agents, but it omits other behavioral traits such as return value, idempotency, or side effects. The disclosure is minimal but not absent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences long, starts with the verb and resource, and contains no fluff. Every word contributes to the core action and the permission requirement, making it appropriately sized and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of 15 parameters, no annotations, and no output schema, the description is too sparse. It lacks guidance on return values, success/failure responses, or how the optional metadata fields are used, leaving the agent underinformed for a non-trivial creation operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 20%, and the description does not compensate for the many undocumented metadata fields. The phrase 'optional organization metadata' is vague and does not clarify meaning of parameters like 'finantialCardNumber' or 'orgLogo'. The schema already indicates only 'name' is required, so the description adds little parameter-specific value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Create') and the resource ('a Seed organization'), and adds context about optional organization metadata. This distinguishes it from other create_* tools such as seed_create_frame or seed_create_table, which target different resource types.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is for creating organizations and specifies a prerequisite (create access), but it does not compare with alternatives like seed_register_org or indicate when to prefer this tool over similar ones. No exclusionary guidance is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.