getSections

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are given, so description carries full burden. It discloses pagination behavior (default/max limit, offset, use of _links.next). It does not mention read-only nature or auth, but being a 'get' operation it's clear. Good disclosure of limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences in English plus Japanese translation. Front-loaded with purpose, no filler. Every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 4 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description covers core functionality and pagination. It could mention that it returns a list of sections, but the hint about _links.next implies a paginated list. Adequate for a listing tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers 100% of parameters, so description adds default values and mentions _links.next for pagination, which is beyond schema. Provides useful context for pagination that enhances understanding of limit and offset.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it retrieves sections for a specified project and suite, with pagination support. This distinguishes it from getSection (singular) and similar tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implied usage when needing to list sections, but no explicit when-not-to-use or comparison to alternative tools like getSection. Pagination details are provided but context for selection is absent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.