boxes.suspend
Suspend a running virtual machine domain by providing its name or UUID.
Instructions
Suspend a running domain
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| nameOrUuid | Yes | Domain name or UUID |
Suspend a running virtual machine domain by providing its name or UUID.
Suspend a running domain
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| nameOrUuid | Yes | Domain name or UUID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as impact on network connections, state changes, or side effects. It only states the basic action without detail.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence with no unnecessary words. However, it could be slightly expanded to include key behavioral context without losing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of annotations and output schema, the description is insufficient. It does not explain the implications of suspension, how to reverse it, or any required domain state, leaving the agent underinformed.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% for the single parameter 'nameOrUuid', which is adequately described as 'Domain name or UUID'. The description adds no further semantic value beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Suspend') and the resource ('a running domain'). It is specific and avoids tautology, but does not differentiate from sibling tools like 'shutdown' or 'stop', which could cause confusion.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'boxes.shutdown' or 'boxes.reboot'. The description does not indicate prerequisites or post-conditions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/btafoya/boxes-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server