boxes.snapshots.delete
Deletes a specified snapshot from a virtual machine using its domain name or UUID.
Instructions
Delete a snapshot
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| snapshot | Yes | Snapshot name | |
| nameOrUuid | Yes | Domain name or UUID |
Deletes a specified snapshot from a virtual machine using its domain name or UUID.
Delete a snapshot
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| snapshot | Yes | Snapshot name | |
| nameOrUuid | Yes | Domain name or UUID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full burden for behavioral disclosure. It only says 'Delete a snapshot', which is a tautology of the tool name, and provides no information about side effects, permanence, or required domain state. This is insufficient transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very concise at 5 words, but it is under-specified and lacks necessary details that would earn its place. It is not verbose, but it fails to add value beyond the tool name. A more balanced length with additional context would improve it.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simplicity of the tool and the lack of output schema or annotations, the description is incomplete. It does not explain the outcome, any confirmation behavior, or constraints. The description covers only the basic action, leaving gaps in understanding for the agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description does not add meaning to the parameters beyond what the schema provides, but it also does not contradict or mislead. The parameters are minimally described in the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Delete a snapshot' clearly states the action and resource, and distinguishes from sibling tools like 'boxes.snapshots.create' and 'boxes.snapshots.revert'. However, it could be slightly more precise by specifying the domain context.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No usage guidelines are provided. The description does not indicate when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'boxes.snapshots.revert' or 'boxes.snapshots.list', nor any prerequisites or conditions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/btafoya/boxes-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server