Skip to main content
Glama
enesjakozh
brianstone

Jira MCP Server

by brianstone
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Jira MCP サーバー

⚠️ この MCP サーバーは現在開発中です ⚠️

Jira と通信するための MCP サーバー。

これは Jira Data Center REST エンドポイント ( /rest/api/2 ) では機能する可能性がありますが、現時点ではクラウド エンドポイント ( /rest/api/3 ) のみがテストされています。

サーバーの実行

  1. このリポジトリをクローンする

  2. リポジトリにcd

  3. npm install実行する

  4. npm run build実行します。

MCP クライアントでは、次の環境変数を追加する必要があります。

  • JIRA_PROJECT_URL - 末尾に/rest/api/3を含めます。https https://your-project.atlassian.net/rest/api/3のようになります。

  • JIRA_USER_EMAIL - ユーザーのメールアドレス。API認証に必要です。

  • JIRA_API_KEY - Jira APIキー。Jira APIキーの作成と管理に関する情報は、 こちらでご覧いただけます。

  • JIRA_PROJECT_KEY - 新しい課題を作成するときに使用するデフォルトのキー

Related MCP server: Jira Cloud MCP Server

利用可能なツール

  • キーで問題を取得

  • 検索の問題

  • 問題を作成

  • 問題の割り当て

  • 課題の割り当て解除

  • 問題を編集

  • 移行問題

  • アーカイブの問題

リソース

セットアップしましたが、何も実装されていません。

MCP クライアント (Claude Desktop、Cursor など) を使用したセットアップ

MCP クライアントの構成ファイルにサーバーを追加します。

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "jira-mcp-server": {
      "command": "node",
      "args": ["path-to-repo/jira-mcp-server/build/index.js"],
      "env": {
        "JIRA_PROJECT_URL": "https://project-url.atlassian.net/rest/api/3",
        "JIRA_USER_EMAIL": "your_email@example.com",
        "JIRA_API_KEY": "yourAPIkey",
        "JIRA_PROJECT_KEY": "ABC"
      }
    }
  }
}

問題

何か問題が発生した場合は、お知らせください。

Available Tools

1 tool
example_toolC

An example tool that processes messages

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
messageNoMessage to process

TDQS

C2.2/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided and the description lacks any behavioral traits such as side effects, permissions, or read-only/mutating nature.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

While short, the description is under-specified and does not earn its place with substantive information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple schema and no output schema or annotations, the description fails to provide complete context, e.g., what the output is or expected behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the description adds no value beyond the schema definition for the only parameter 'message'.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose2/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'processes messages' is vague and does not specify what kind of processing or distinguish from sibling tools like api-client, data-processor, and file-handler.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives; no exclusions or prerequisites mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. 1 tool updatev1.0.0
    • First observedexample_tool
Deploy Server
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

TDQS

C2.8/5.0

Scored across 1 tool

Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap between tools. The single tool 'example_tool' has a distinct purpose by default, as there are no other tools to compare it to.

Naming Consistency5/5

The naming is trivially consistent because there is only one tool. The tool name 'example_tool' follows a snake_case pattern, and with no other tools, there is no inconsistency to evaluate.

Tool Count2/5

A single tool is too few for a Jira MCP server, which typically involves managing issues, projects, workflows, and other entities. This minimal set suggests an incomplete or placeholder implementation, failing to cover the expected domain scope.

Completeness1/5

The tool set is severely incomplete for a Jira server. With only an 'example_tool' that processes messages, there are no tools for core Jira operations like creating, retrieving, updating, or deleting issues, projects, or other resources, leaving significant gaps that will cause agent failures.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues

Resources

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • Jira MCP Server

    AlexVulaj
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    An MCP server for integrating with Jira Server instances, enabling natural language interactions to create, update, search, and manage issues and comments.
    65
    1
    MIT

  • Jira Cloud MCP Server

    aaronsb
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    MCP server for interacting with Jira Cloud instances. Enables issue management, JQL queries, project and sprint management, and batch operations via natural language interfaces.
    195
    4
    MIT

Appeared in Searches