bpp-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to bpp-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenancePhylogenetic inference server driving IQ-TREE 2, always returning per-clade bootstrap support plus model selection, tree comparison, and alignment simulation, with detailed diagnostics like conflicting clades and model uncertainty.6260 PyPIGPL 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables the generation, mutation, and evolution of DNA and protein sequences using various evolutionary models and phylogenetic algorithms. It supports realistic next-generation sequencing read simulation and population-level evolutionary tracking for bioinformatics research and testing.6BSD 2-Clause "Simplified"
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables preparing data, building and running Mplus input files, and reading the output back as tables, including fit indices, parameter estimates, and warnings.10MIT

Bio-MCP FastQC Serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to perform quality control analysis on high-throughput sequencing data using FastQC and MultiQC. It supports single-file and batch processing of FASTQ/FASTA files and generates comprehensive, interactive summary reports.MIT- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceBioOpenMCP enables users to run bioinformatics tools like FastQC, Cutadapt, and STAR with background execution and status checking. It integrates with Claude Desktop to perform quality control, trimming, alignment, and reporting via natural language.1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to perform DNA/RNA sequence alignment using BWA (Burrows-Wheeler Aligner), supporting both short and long read alignment to reference genomes with indexing, BWA-MEM, and BWA-backtrack algorithms.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 16 tools
Each tool maps to a distinct BPP pipeline stage: environment check, data inspection/conversion, tree building/reading, control-file creation/editing/linting, documentation lookup/search, smoke testing, and run-command generation. The closest overlap is inspect_data vs convert_data, but the dry-run versus write distinction is made explicit in the descriptions. No tools appear to do the same thing.
All tool names use snake_case and follow a mostly consistent verb_noun or verb_object pattern (check_environment, inspect_data, convert_data, build_species_tree, lint_control_file, run_command). The only minor variant is smoke_test as a compound noun, but it still fits the readable convention and does not disrupt predictability.
The server has 16 tools, slightly above the typical 3-15 range, but each corresponds to a real, non-redundant step in the BPP preparation workflow. Given the domain's complexity (data conversion, BED creation, subsetting, tree handling, control-file lifecycle, docs, smoke test, and run command), the count is reasonable rather than bloated.
The surface covers the core lifecycle from environment check through data conversion, tree building, control-file creation/linting, smoke testing, and final run-command generation. However, check_environment references set_project when no project root is configured, yet that tool is absent, leaving a configuration dead end; post-run BPP result parsing is also outside the surface.